ArticleCurrent drug safety2024
Assessment of Neurologic Safety Profile of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reaction Reports.
Article in Current drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used in immunotherapy have revolutionized cancer management. However, ICI therapy can come with serious neurologic risks.
objectiveThe objective of our study is to analyze the occurrence of neurologic events with ICIs.
methodsWe referred to EudraVigilance (EV) and VigiAccess to evaluate the frequency of individual case safety reports (ICSRs), including neurologic events with ICIs. Data was gathered for a period from the date of ICI's marketing authorization till 30 January 2023. The computational assessment was conducted with the help of reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultsOverall, 8181 ICSRs in EV and 15905 ICSRs from VigiAccess were retrieved for neurologic events, with at least one ICI as the suspected drug. The majority of the ICSRs were reported for nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab, whereas frequently reported events were neuropathy peripheral, myasthenia gravis, seizure, Guillain-Barre syndrome, paraesthesia, syncope, encephalopathy, somnolence. Under EV, 92% of ICSRs were reported as serious, 10% included fatal outcomes, and nearly 61% cited patient recovery. Atezolizumab (ROR 1.64, 95% CI 1.75- 1.52), cemiplimab (ROR 1.61, 95% CI 1.98-1.3), and nivolumab (ROR 1.38, 95% CI 1.44-1.31) had a considerable increase in the frequency of ICSR reporting. Cerebrovascular accident, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, tremor, and somnolence were identified as potential signals.
conclusionICIs were significantly associated with neurologic risks, which cannot be generalized. A considerable increase in ICSR reporting frequency was observed with atezolizumab, cemiplimab, and nivolumab, while avelumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, and cemiplimab were linked with four potential signals. These findings suggest the consideration of a revision of the neurologic safety profile of ICIs. Furthermore, the necessity for additional ad-hoc research is emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38310553What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.