Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38310547›Full record

ReviewCurrent pediatric reviews2025

Malignant and Benign Head and Neck Tumors of the Pediatric Age: A Narrative Review.

Ginevra Micangeli, Michela Menghi, Giovanni Profeta, Roberto Paparella, Francesca Tarani, Carla Petrella, Christian Barbato, Antonio Minni, Antonio Greco, Giampiero Ferraguti and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pediatric reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Imaging characteristics of parotid gland juvenile capillary hemangioma: A Retrospective analysis of 35 pathologically confirmed cases.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ginevra MicangeliDepartment of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Michela MenghiDepartment of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ProfetaDepartment of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Roberto PaparellaDepartment of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesca TaraniDepartment of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Carla PetrellaInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC-CNR), Department of Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Christian BarbatoInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC-CNR), Department of Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Antonio MinniDepartment of Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Antonio GrecoDepartment of Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Roma, Italy.
Giampiero FerragutiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Luigi TaraniDepartment of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marco FioreInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC-CNR), Department of Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology · ITOspedale generale di zona San Camillo Treviso · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant tumors of the head and neck are rare in children, but it is important to know these lesions and identify them early in order to have a good outcome for these patients. Benign lesions of the head and neck are much more frequent and have an excellent prognosis. For this reason, it is necessary to recognize the warning signs and symptoms and understand when to refer the patient to a reference center for the treatment of these pathologies. The clinical presentation of both benign and malignant lesions in children may be similar as usually, both categories have compressive effects. This confirms the fact that the clinical diagnosis is not sufficient and always requires instrumental investigations and biopsies. In this narrative review, we analyzed both malignant lesions such as lymphoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, thyroid tumors, salivary gland tumors, neuroblastoma, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and benign ones such as cystic dermoid teratoma, hemangioma, juvenile angiofibroma and fibrosis dysplasia. Indeed, we set out to discuss the most common lesions of this site by evaluating their characteristics to highlight the differentiation of malignant tumors from benign lesions and their correct clinical-therapeutic management. A literature search was carried out in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify all narrative reviews addressing malignant and benign head and neck tumors of the pediatric age. In conclusion, the care of children affected by head and neck benign lesions and malignancy must be combined and multidisciplinary. It is essential to recognize the diseases early in order to differentiate and intervene as soon as possible for the correct clinical-therapeutic management.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsChildDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansPrognosisadolescent.childrenHead and neck cancerpediatricsurgerytherapy

Identifiers

PMID38310547
OpenAlexW4391522232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.