Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38310349›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Factors Influencing Dentists' Choice of Restorative Materials for Single-Tooth Crowns: A Survey Among Saudi Practitioners.

Ali Robaian, Nawaf Munawir Alotaibi, Aljowhara Khaled Allaboon, Dana Saleh AlTuwaijri, Abdullah Fahad Aljarallah, Rola Salman Alshehri, Aljawharah Ali Alabsi, Mubashir Baig Mirza, Mohammed M Al Moaleem

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ali RobaianConservative Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Nawaf Munawir AlotaibiResident, Saudi Board in Family Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aljowhara Khaled AllaboonGeneral Dentist, Private Dental Practice, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dana Saleh AlTuwaijriResident, Saudi Board in Restorative Dentistry, Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Fahad AljarallahResident, Saudi Board in Family Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rola Salman AlshehriDental Student, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdul Rahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aljawharah Ali AlabsiGeneral Dentist, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mubashir Baig MirzaConservative Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2875-1191
Mohammed M Al MoaleemDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SARiyadh Elm University · SAJazan University · SAKing Saud University · SAMinistry of Health · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SASaudi Heart Association · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Material selection is crucial in restorative dentistry, influenced by aesthetics, material properties, and tooth location. This understanding is key for advancing dental practices and patient outcomes. The present study aimed to assess dentists' preferences for restorative materials in single-tooth crowns (SC) and how abutment tooth location and preparation margins influence these choices. MATERIAL AND METHODS A web-based pre-validated questionnaire survey was conducted among 811 actively practicing dentists in Saudi Arabia. RESULTS In posterior teeth, we found that ceramic was the most preferred material for SC regardless of the abutment tooth location and location of margins, followed by porcelain fused to metal (PFMs). In anterior teeth, ceramics were preferred, followed by CAD/CAM-based resin SC. Among the choice of ceramics in teeth for both supra-gingival margins, monolith zirconia was the most-preferred material for SC fabrication in posterior teeth, followed by zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic. Similarly, for sub-gingival margins, monolith zirconia crowns were the most popular option in posterior teeth among the respondents, with the highest in the mandibular molar region. In the anterior region, layered zirconia was the least preferred, and lithium disilicate ceramics was the most-favored option. A statistically significant difference existed between supra- and subgingival preparation for teeth 11 (P=0.01), 16 (P=0.03), and 34 (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Ceramic was the material of choice among Saudi dentists for replacement of SC, irrespective of the location and preparation margin. Monolith zirconia was usually selected for posterior teeth and lithium disilicate ceramics was the top choice in anterior teeth.

Indexed as

Dental PorcelainTooth CrownZirconiumCeramicsDentistsHumansMaterials TestingSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesDental PorcelainZirconiumzirconium oxide

Identifiers

PMID38310349
PMCPMC10851618
OpenAlexW4390192866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.