ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Protein language models meet reduced amino acid alphabets.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing protein tokenization: reduced amino acid alphabets for efficient and accurate protein language models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Prediction of peptide cleavage sites using protein language models and graph neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Uncovering differential tolerance to deletions versus substitutions with a protein language model.Cell systems · 2025Article
- PETA: evaluating the impact of protein transfer learning with sub-word tokenization on downstream applications.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationProtein language models (PLMs), which borrowed ideas for modelling and inference from natural language processing, have demonstrated the ability to extract meaningful representations in an unsupervised way. This led to significant performance improvement in several downstream tasks. Clustering amino acids based on their physical-chemical properties to achieve reduced alphabets has been of interest in past research, but their application to PLMs or folding models is unexplored.
resultsHere, we investigate the efficacy of PLMs trained on reduced amino acid alphabets in capturing evolutionary information, and we explore how the loss of protein sequence information impacts learned representations and downstream task performance. Our empirical work shows that PLMs trained on the full alphabet and a large number of sequences capture fine details that are lost in alphabet reduction methods. We further show the ability of a structure prediction model(ESMFold) to fold CASP14 protein sequences translated using a reduced alphabet. For 10 proteins out of the 50 targets, reduced alphabets improve structural predictions with LDDT-Cα differences of up to 19%. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Trained models and code are available at github.com/Ieremie/reduced-alph-PLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.