Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38310333›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Protein language models meet reduced amino acid alphabets.

Ioan Ieremie, Rob M Ewing, Mahesan Niranjan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ioan IeremieVision, Learning & Control Group, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2897-2541
Rob M EwingBiological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Mahesan NiranjanVision, Learning & Control Group, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.

Funding

Artificial and Augmented Intelligence for Automated Scientific Discovery EP/S000356/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilEPSRC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProtein language models (PLMs), which borrowed ideas for modelling and inference from natural language processing, have demonstrated the ability to extract meaningful representations in an unsupervised way. This led to significant performance improvement in several downstream tasks. Clustering amino acids based on their physical-chemical properties to achieve reduced alphabets has been of interest in past research, but their application to PLMs or folding models is unexplored.

resultsHere, we investigate the efficacy of PLMs trained on reduced amino acid alphabets in capturing evolutionary information, and we explore how the loss of protein sequence information impacts learned representations and downstream task performance. Our empirical work shows that PLMs trained on the full alphabet and a large number of sequences capture fine details that are lost in alphabet reduction methods. We further show the ability of a structure prediction model(ESMFold) to fold CASP14 protein sequences translated using a reduced alphabet. For 10 proteins out of the 50 targets, reduced alphabets improve structural predictions with LDDT-Cα differences of up to 19%. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Trained models and code are available at github.com/Ieremie/reduced-alph-PLM.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingProteinsAminesAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceAminesAmino AcidsProteins

Identifiers

PMID38310333
PMCPMC10872054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.