Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38309753›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2024

Understanding and addressing femicide in Africa: a systematic review of empirical research.

Tarique Variava, Bianca Dekel

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tarique VariavaPsychology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa Tarique.variava@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-6208
Bianca DekelSouth African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, Western Cape, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAgainst the backdrop of a high prevalence rate of femicide across Africa, it is crucial to gain methodological insights into the existing research on femicide.

objectiveTo develop evidence-based strategies to address the complex and multifaceted nature of femicide in Africa, ultimately contributing to its prevention and reduction. DATA SOURCES: Empirical research was searched for using four electronic research databases (ProQuest, Web of Science, EBSCO and PubMed). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Full-text empirical articles (ie, observational or retrospective studies) published in English between the period of 1 January 1992 and 30 July 2021, which sampled femicide victims and/or perpetrators in Africa, were included in the review. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted using predefined data fields, including study quality indicators. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thomas and Harden's (2008) thematic synthesis method was used to analyse 22 empirical articles that met the inclusion criteria in this study.

resultsThis review highlights the significant focus on femicide research in South Africa. Most studies of femicides have used cross-sectional research designs. This review also demonstrates that crime dockets have benefited significantly from forensic contributions and police investigations. Furthermore, research efforts have uncovered various contextual factors that contribute to femicide, such as the high prevalence of early childhood trauma and the loss of primary caregivers among femicide offenders.

conclusionThis systematic review offers a thorough synthesis of the current understanding of femicide in an African context, focusing on South Africa. Despite acknowledging the strengths and limitations of the existing knowledge, this review emphasises the urgency of addressing femicide and calls for international attention and action to effectively combat this pressing issue.

Indexed as

HomicideCross-Sectional StudiesEmpirical ResearchFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODSSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID38309753
PMCPMC10840054
OpenAlexW4391518183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.