Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38309719›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2024

The Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Deniz Can Guven, Gozde Kavgaci, Enes Erul, Masood Pasha Syed, Tara Magge, Anwaar Saeed, Suayib Yalcin, Ibrahim Halil Sahin

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. KRASScience advances · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Deniz Can GuvenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6924-9467
Gozde KavgaciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
Enes ErulDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2487-2087
Masood Pasha SyedDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Tara MaggeDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anwaar SaeedDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Suayib YalcinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey.
Ibrahim Halil SahinDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2758-3077
University of Pittsburgh · USHacettepe University Hospital · TRHacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care, particularly in immune-inflamed tumors and tumors with a high mutational burden, like microsatellite instable colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their effectiveness in microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC is limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in MSS CRC and explore promising combination strategies. A comprehensive search from the Web of Science, Medline, and Embase databases, for studies published until 14 November 2022, identified 53 clinical trials included in the review. ICI monotherapy or ICI-ICI combinations demonstrated limited clinical activity for patients with MSS CRC, with overall response rates below (ORR) 10% in most studies. The ICI and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) garnered ORRs ranging from 10% to 40% and indicated a higher benefit for patients, particularly those without active liver metastases. The combination of ICIs with anti-VEGF agents showed modest ORRs, especially in the earlier treatment lines and in combination with chemotherapy. While these combinations could lead to modest improvements, well-defined biomarkers for long-term benefit are yet to be delineated. Combinations involving BRAF inhibitors with ICIs were studied, showing promising responses with combination approaches in molecularly defined subgroups. In conclusion, while ICI monotherapy has limited efficacy in MSS CRC, combination strategies hold promise to enhance survival outcomes. Further research is necessary to identify optimal combination approaches, predictive biomarkers for treatment response, as well as enrollment according to tumor molecular characteristics.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorscolorectal cancerimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapymicrosatellite stabletyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38309719
PMCPMC11067816
OpenAlexW4391517807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.