ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2024
Inference of network connectivity from temporally binned spike trains.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute DOI exposure drives cortical hyperexcitability and functional network remodeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deriving connectivity from spiking activity in detailed models of large-scale cortical microcircuits.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Magnetic Detection of Neural Activity by Nanocoil Transducers.Nano letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProcessing neural activity to reconstruct network connectivity is a central focus of neuroscience, yet the spatiotemporal requisites of biological nervous systems are challenging for current neuronal sensing modalities. Consequently, methods that leverage limited data to successfully infer synaptic connections, predict activity at single unit resolution, and decipher their effect on whole systems, can uncover critical information about neural processing. Despite the emergence of powerful methods for inferring connectivity, network reconstruction based on temporally subsampled data remains insufficiently unexplored. NEW
methodWe infer synaptic weights by processing firing rates within variable time bins for a heterogeneous feed-forward network of excitatory, inhibitory, and unconnected units. We assess classification and optimize model parameters for postsynaptic spike train reconstruction. We test our method on a physiological network of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons displaying bursting patterns and assess prediction of postsynaptic activity from microelectrode array data.
resultsResults reveal parameters for improved prediction and performance and suggest that lower resolution data and limited access to neurons can be preferred. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Recent computational methods demonstrate highly improved reconstruction of connectivity from networks of parallel spike trains by considering spike lag, time-varying firing rates, and other underlying dynamics. However, these methods insufficiently explore temporal subsampling representative of novel data types.
conclusionsWe provide a framework for reverse engineering neural networks from data with limited temporal quality, describing optimal parameters for each bin size, which can be further improved using non-linear methods and applied to more complicated readouts and connectivity distributions in multiple brain circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.