Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38308803›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2024

The relationship between pathological brain activity and functional network connectivity in glioma patients.

Mona L M Zimmermann, Lucas C Breedt, Eduarda G Z Centeno, Jaap C Reijneveld, Fernando A N Santos, Cornelis J Stam, Marike R van Lingen, Menno M Schoonheim, Arjan Hillebrand, Linda Douw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Jointly estimating individual and group networks from fMRI data.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mona L M ZimmermannAnatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.l.m.zimmermann@amsterdamumc.nl.
Lucas C BreedtAnatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eduarda G Z CentenoAnatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap C ReijneveldDepartment of Neurology, Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Fernando A N SantosAnatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J StamClinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marike R van LingenAnatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Menno M SchoonheimAnatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjan HillebrandAmsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda DouwAnatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds voor de Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding (KWF) 12885Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 016.146.086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlioma is associated with pathologically high (peri)tumoral brain activity, which relates to faster progression. Functional connectivity is disturbed locally and throughout the entire brain, associating with symptomatology. We, therefore, investigated how local activity and network measures relate to better understand how the intricate relationship between the tumor and the rest of the brain may impact disease and symptom progression.

methodsWe obtained magnetoencephalography in 84 de novo glioma patients and 61 matched healthy controls. The offset of the power spectrum, a proxy of neuronal activity, was calculated for 210 cortical regions. We calculated patients' regional deviations in delta, theta and lower alpha network connectivity as compared to controls, using two network measures: clustering coefficient (local connectivity) and eigenvector centrality (integrative connectivity). We then tested group differences in activity and connectivity between (peri)tumoral, contralateral homologue regions, and the rest of the brain. We also correlated regional offset to connectivity.

resultsAs expected, patients' (peri)tumoral activity was pathologically high, and patients showed higher clustering and lower centrality than controls. At the group-level, regionally high activity related to high clustering in controls and patients alike. However, within-patient analyses revealed negative associations between regional deviations in brain activity and clustering, such that pathologically high activity coincided with low network clustering, while regions with 'normal' activity levels showed high network clustering.

conclusionOur results indicate that pathological activity and connectivity co-localize in a complex manner in glioma. This insight is relevant to our understanding of disease progression and cognitive symptomatology.

Indexed as

Brain MappingGliomaBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyBrain tumorCancer neuroscienceClinical neurophysiologyGraph theory

Identifiers

PMID38308803
PMCPMC10876827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.