Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38308761›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Assessment of quality of life in thyroid cancer patients using the EORTC thyroid-specific questionnaire: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Shivakumar Thiagarajan, Khuzema Fatehi, Nandini Menon, Mahesh Sawant, Ankita Pal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shivakumar ThiagarajanDivision of Head and Neck, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India. drshiva78in@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-3338
Khuzema FatehiDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Bombay Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Nandini MenonBLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Mahesh SawantTata Memorial Center, Mumbai, India.
Ankita PalACTREC, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Navi Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INBombay Hospital · INMax Super Speciality Hospital · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies on the quality of life (QoL) among the thyroid cancer survivors have shown conflicting results. This may be since many of these studies have not used thyroid cancer-specific questionnaires. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn our study we have translated the EORTC THY-34, validated and served it in a cross-sectional study to the assess the QoL among thyroid cancer patients free of disease during their routine follow-up. Patients were categorized based on the duration from treatment completion, ATA risk stratification, treatment received, number of RAI sessions and thyroid function status during analysis.

resultsOverall, 220 thyroid cancer survivors were included in this study. In general, in the EORTC QLQ-C30, the global QoL of thyroid cancer patients were good with a mean score of 72.99. The highest score was that for social functioning (89.55). In the EORTC-THY34 all the patients in the cohort had relatively lower scores (on symptom scales). Overall, there was no difference in the QLQ-C30 and THY-34 QoL with respect to any of the categorization mentioned above. However, our thyroid cancer patients QoL scores were better and/or comparable to those in published literature and they were also better or comparable to the QoL of the general population those were available in literature.

conclusionsThere was no difference in the QoL scores based on various categories. To better understand the quality of life of these patients a prospective longitudinal study with baseline values and values at regular intervals might give us a better insight.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeThyroid NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesEORTCQoLThyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID38308761
PMCPMC13407952
OpenAlexW4391509746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.