ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2024
Targeting Efficient Features of Urate Oxidase to Increase Its Solubility.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular urate oxidase from Arthrobacter creatinolyticus SA1: statistical optimization, purification, and in-vitro evaluation of antihyperuricemic activity.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Strategies for enhancing protein solubility: methods, applications, and prospects.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
With the demand for mass production of protein drugs, solubility has become a serious issue. Extrinsic and intrinsic factors both affect this property. A homotetrameric cofactor-free urate oxidase (UOX) is not sufficiently soluble. To engineer UOX for optimum solubility, it is important to identify the most effective factor that influences solubility. The most effective feature to target for protein engineering was determined by measuring various solubility-related factors of UOX. A large library of homologous sequences was obtained from the databases. The data was reduced to six enzymes from different organisms. On the basis of various sequence- and structure-derived elements, the most and the least soluble enzymes were defined. To determine the best protein engineering target for modification, features of the most and least soluble enzymes were compared. Metabacillus fastidiosus UOX was the most soluble enzyme, while Agrobacterium globiformis UOX was the least soluble. According to the comparison-constant method, positive surface patches caused by arginine residue distribution are appropriate targets for modification. Two Arg to Ala mutations were introduced to the least soluble enzyme to test this hypothesis. These mutations significantly enhanced the mutant's solubility. While different algorithms produced conflicting results, it was difficult to determine which proteins were most and least soluble. Solubility prediction requires multiple algorithms based on these controversies. Protein surfaces should be investigated regionally rather than globally, and both sequence and structural data should be considered. Several other biotechnological products could be engineered using the data reduction and comparison-constant methods used in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.