Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38308622›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2024

Impact of formulary-related pharmacy claim rejections of cariprazine on health care utilization and treatment patterns among patients with bipolar I disorder.

François Laliberté, Enrico Zanardo, Sean D MacKnight, Ana Urosevic, Sally W Wade, Mousam Parikh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

François LalibertéGroupe d'analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Enrico ZanardoAnalysis Group, Inc., Denver, CO.
Sean D MacKnightGroupe d'analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Ana UrosevicGroupe d'analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Sally W WadeWade Outcomes Research and Consulting, Salt Lake City, UT.
Mousam ParikhAbbVie, Florham Park, NJ.
Outcomes Research Consortium · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFormulary restrictions, intended to limit inappropriate medication use and decrease pharmacy costs, may prevent or delay patients with bipolar I disorder from initiating cariprazine, a dopamine D

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of formulary-related cariprazine claim rejections on health care resource utilization (HCRU) and treatment patterns among patients newly prescribed cariprazine for bipolar I disorder.

methodsSymphony Health Integrated Dataverse was used to identify commercially insured adults (aged ≥18 years) with bipolar I disorder and at least 1 pharmacy claim for cariprazine (rejected because of formulary restrictions or approved; date of the first claim is the index date) from March 2015 through October 2020. Formulary-related rejection reasons included noncoverage, prior authorization requirement, and step therapy requirement. Baseline characteristics were evaluated during the 12 months pre-index and balanced between rejected and approved cohorts using 1:2 propensity score matching. HCRU outcomes included all-cause and mental health (MH)-related hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits. Treatment patterns were analyzed descriptively and included treatment delay and atypical antipsychotic use. HCRU was reported per patient-year and compared between cohorts using rate ratios; 95% CIs and

resultsThe matched rejected and approved cohorts comprised 1,554 and 3,108 patients, respectively. The rejected cohort had 22% more all-cause and 24% more MH-related hospitalizations per patient-year vs the approved cohort (rate ratio [95% CI], all-cause: 1.22 [1.01-1.48],

conclusionsPatients with bipolar I disorder and formulary-related cariprazine claim rejections experienced significantly more hospitalizations than patients whose initial claim was approved; ED and outpatient visits were similar between cohorts. Less than a quarter of patients whose initial claim was rejected later received cariprazine, and more than one-third never received any atypical antipsychotic. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the impact of formulary-related rejections of cariprazine on HCRU and treatment patterns in patients with bipolar I disorder.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderPharmacyPiperazinesAdolescentAdultHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective StudiesAntipsychotic AgentscariprazinePiperazines

Identifiers

PMID38308622
PMCPMC10839466
OpenAlexW4391509632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.