Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38308329›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2024

Impact of oil-based contrast agents in hysterosalpingography on fertility outcomes in endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Baoli Xie, Yingqin Huang, Fu Hang, Jiaxin Yu, Qianwen Hu, Jiaxu Li, Aiping Qin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Baoli Xie *Center of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Yingqin Huang *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Guangxi, Guangxi, 530021, China.
Fu HangCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Jiaxin YuCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Qianwen HuCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Jiaxu LiCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China.
Aiping QinCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China. qinaiping@gxmu.edu.cn.
First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNGuangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNGuangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have suggested that oil-based contrast agents used during hysterosalpingography (HSG) in infertile patients can enhance fertility. However, limited research has investigated the effect of oil-based contrast medium specifically in individuals with endometriosis-related infertility.

objectiveThis study aims to explore the impact of oil-based contrast medium on fertility outcomes in women with endometriosis-related infertility.

methodsConducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (January 2020 to June 2022), the study included 512 patients undergoing HSG. Patients were categorized into oil-based and non-oil-based groups, and after propensity score matching, demographic characteristics were compared. Main outcomes included clinical pregnancy rates, live birth rates, early miscarriage rates, and ectopic pregnancy rates.

resultsIn our analysis, the Oil-based group showed significantly better outcomes compared to the Non-oil-based group. Specifically, the Oil-based group had higher clinical pregnancy rates (51.39% vs. 27.36%) and increased live birth rates (31.48% vs. 19.93%). This trend held true for expectant treatment, IUI, and IVF/ICSI, except for surgical treatment where no significant difference was observed. After adjusting for various factors using propensity score matching, the Non-oil-based group consistently exhibited lower clinical pregnancy rates compared to the Oil-based group. The Odds Ratio (OR) was 0.38 (95%CI: 0.27-0.55) without adjustment, 0.34 (0.22-0.51) in multivariable analysis, 0.39 (0.27-0.57) using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and 0.22 (0.14-0.35) in propensity score matching.

conclusionOil-based contrast medium used in HSG for women with endometriosis-related infertility is associated with higher clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates compared to Non-oil-based contrast medium.

Indexed as

EndometriosisInfertility, FemaleChinaContrast MediaFemaleFertilityHumansHysterosalpingographyLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaEndometriosisFertility enhancementHSGInfertilityOil-based contrast mediumPropensity score matching(PSM)

Identifiers

PMID38308329
PMCPMC10837917
OpenAlexW4391513641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.