Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38308322›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2024

Women's voices and meanings of empowerment for reproductive decisions: a qualitative study in Mozambique.

Sofia Castro Lopes, Deborah Constant, Sílvia Fraga, Jane Harries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofia Castro LopesDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. sofia.tclopes@gmail.com.
Deborah ConstantDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sílvia FragaEPIUnit-Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Jane HarriesDivision of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town FRC Award 2019Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CEECIND/01516/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/146625/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen in Mozambique are often disempowered when it comes to making decisions concerning their lives, including their bodies and reproductive options. This study aimed to explore the views of women in Mozambique about key elements of empowerment for reproductive decisions and the meanings they attach to these elements.

methodsQualitative in-depth interviews were undertaken with 64 women of reproductive age (18-49 years) in two provinces in Mozambique. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling. Data collection took place between February and March 2020 in Maputo city and Province, and during August 2020 in Nampula Province. A thematic analysis was performed.

resultsWomen described crucial elements of how power is exerted for reproductive choices. These choices include the ability to plan the number and timing of pregnancies and the ability either to negotiate with sexual partners by voicing choice and influencing decisions, or to exercise their right to make decisions independently. They considered that women with empowerment had characteristics such as independence, active participation and being free. These characteristics are recognized key enablers for the process of women's empowerment.

conclusionsThis study's findings contribute to an expanded conceptualization and operationalization of women's sexual and reproductive empowerment by unveiling key elements that need to be considered in future research and approaches to women's empowerment. Furthermore, it gave women the central role and voice in the research of empowerment's conceptualization and measurement where women's views and meanings are seldom considered.

Indexed as

Decision MakingReproductionAdolescentAdultEmpowermentFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMozambiquePregnancyQualitative ResearchWomen's RightsYoung AdultConceptualizationMozambiqueReproductive empowermentWomen’s empowerment

Identifiers

PMID38308322
PMCPMC10837942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.