ArticleLa Radiologia medica2024
Machine learning-based radiomics analysis in predicting RAS mutational status using magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Delirium Prediction Model for Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Toward multimodal integration of colorectal cancer and chronic kidney disease: transcriptomic modeling as a framework for the SIRIO study "Spatial radiomics and transcriptomics to the discovery of the cross-link between colon cancer and chronic kidney disease".Radiology and oncology · 2026Article
- Radiogenomic landscape of the hallmarks of cancer.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Radiomics of portal-phase ring enhancement: a novel imaging biomarker for bevacizumab response associated with overall survival rates. It might help with surgical decision-making in colorectal liver metastases?Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- From promise to practice: a scoping review of AI applications in abdominal radiology.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Review
- Assessing the multi-software robustness of radiomic biomarkers: a three-tool evaluation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Integrated radiomics and machine learning approach for ras mutation status prediction in colorectal liver metastases.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Radiomics integrated with machine and deep learning analysis of T2-weighted and arterial-phase T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for non-invasive detection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Cross-Software Radiomic Feature Robustness Assessed by Hierarchical Clustering and Composite Index Analysis: A Multi-Cancer Study on Colorectal and Liver Lesions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Radiomics Beyond Radiology: Literature Review on Prediction of Future Liver Remnant Volume and Function Before Hepatic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Hybrid Approach Based on Muscle Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- MRI management of focal liver lesions: what a beginner cannot fail to know.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- A combined radiomics and clinical model for preoperative differentiation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and intrahepatic bile duct stones with cholangitis: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- An Update of AI and Radiomics in Precision Oncology: Insights from Liver Tumors as Case Models.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the efficacy of radiomics features, obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with hepatospecific contrast agent, in pre-surgical setting, to predict RAS mutational status in liver metastases.
methodsPatients with MRI in pre-surgical setting were enrolled in a retrospective study. Manual segmentation was made by means 3D Slicer image computing, and 851 radiomics features were extracted as median values using the PyRadiomics Python package. The features were extracted considering the agreement with the Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI). Balancing was performed through synthesis of samples for the underrepresented classes using the self-adaptive synthetic oversampling (SASYNO) approach. Inter- and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess the between-observer and within-observer reproducibility of all radiomics characteristics. For continuous variables, nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was utilized. Benjamini and Hochberg's false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment for multiple testing was used. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis with the calculation of area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (ACC) were assessed for each parameter. Linear and non-logistic regression model (LRM and NLRM) and different machine learning-based classifiers including decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbor (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM) were considered. Moreover, features selection were performed before and after a normalized procedure using two different methods (3-sigma and z-score). McNemar test was used to assess differences statistically significant between dichotomic tables. All statistical procedures were done using MATLAB R2021b Statistics and Machine Toolbox (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).
resultsSeven normalized radiomics features, extracted from arterial phase, 11 normalized radiomics features, from portal phase, 12 normalized radiomics features from hepatobiliary phase and 12 normalized features from T2-W SPACE sequence were robust predictors of RAS mutational status. The multivariate analysis increased significantly the accuracy in RAS prediction when a LRM was used, combining 12 robust normalized features extracted by VIBE hepatobiliary phase reaching an accuracy of 99%, a sensitivity 97%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100% and a NPV of 98%. No statistically significant increase was obtained, considering the tested classifiers DT, KNN and SVM, both without normalization and with normalization methods.
conclusionsNormalized approach in MRI radiomics analysis allows to predict RAS mutational status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38308061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.