ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparison of preparation methods of rat kidney single-cell suspensions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preparation of kidney tissue single-cell suspensions is the basis of single-cell sequencing, flow cytometry and primary cell culture, but it is difficult to prepare high quality whole kidney single-cell suspensions because of the complex structure of the kidney. We explored a technique called stepwise enzymatic digestion (StE) method for preparing a single-cell suspension of rat whole kidney tissue which contained three main steps. The first step is to cut the kidney into a homogenate. The second step is the digestion of renal tubules using Multi Tissue Dissociation Kit 2 and the last step is the digestion of glomeruli using type IV collagenase. We also compared it with two previous techniques, mechanical grinding method and simple enzymatic digestion method. The StE method had the advantages of high intrinsic glomerular cells and immune cells harvest rate, high singlets rate and high cell viability compared with the other two techniques. In conclusion, the StE method is feasible, highly efficient, and worthy of further research and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.