Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38307971›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2024

Triple dissociation of visual, auditory and motor processing in mouse primary visual cortex.

Matthijs N Oude Lohuis, Pietro Marchesi, Umberto Olcese, Cyriel M A Pennartz

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A two-system theory of sensory-evoked brain responses.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inter- and intrahemispheric sources of vestibular signals to V1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthijs N Oude LohuisCognitive and Systems Neuroscience Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9781-848X
Pietro MarchesiCognitive and Systems Neuroscience Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5955-6909
Umberto Olcese *Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-2503
Cyriel M A Pennartz *Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience Group, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. c.m.a.pennartz@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8328-1175
University of Amsterdam · NLChampalimaud Foundation · PTNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NL

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 945539Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) FLAG-ERA JTC 2019 project DOMINO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary sensory cortices respond to crossmodal stimuli-for example, auditory responses are found in primary visual cortex (V1). However, it remains unclear whether these responses reflect sensory inputs or behavioral modulation through sound-evoked body movement. We address this controversy by showing that sound-evoked activity in V1 of awake mice can be dissociated into auditory and behavioral components with distinct spatiotemporal profiles. The auditory component began at approximately 27 ms, was found in superficial and deep layers and originated from auditory cortex. Sound-evoked orofacial movements correlated with V1 neural activity starting at approximately 80-100 ms and explained auditory frequency tuning. Visual, auditory and motor activity were expressed by different laminar profiles and largely segregated subsets of neuronal populations. During simultaneous audiovisual stimulation, visual representations remained dissociable from auditory-related and motor-related activity. This three-fold dissociability of auditory, motor and visual processing is central to understanding how distinct inputs to visual cortex interact to support vision.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexPrimary Visual CortexAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionMicePhotic StimulationVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID38307971
OpenAlexW4391484967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.