ArticleScientific reports2024
Sarcopenia prediction using shear-wave elastography, grayscale ultrasonography, and clinical information with machine learning fusion techniques: feature-level fusion vs. score-level fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Renal Fibrosis Assessment in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Feature and Decision-Level Fusion in Machine Learning Using Clinical and Ultrasound Information.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- Ultrasound Elastography for the Assessment of Sarcopenia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven assessment of sarcopenia in orthopedic geriatrics: technical progress and clinical implications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Echoes of Muscle Aging: The Emerging Role of Shear Wave Elastography in Sarcopenia Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The role of shear wave elastography in diagnosing sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025Article
- Value of grayscale histogram analysis based on ultrasound images in diagnosing sarcopenia.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and evaluate a sarcopenia prediction model by fusing numerical features from shear-wave elastography (SWE) and gray-scale ultrasonography (GSU) examinations, using the rectus femoris muscle (RF) and categorical/numerical features related to clinical information. Both cohorts (development, 70 healthy subjects; evaluation, 81 patients) underwent ultrasonography (SWE and GSU) and computed tomography. Sarcopenia was determined using skeletal muscle index calculated from the computed tomography. Clinical and ultrasonography measurements were used to predict sarcopenia based on a linear regression model with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regularization. Furthermore, clinical and ultrasonography features were combined at the feature and score levels to improve sarcopenia prediction performance. The accuracies of LASSO were 70.57 ± 5.00-81.54 ± 4.83 (clinical) and 69.00 ± 4.52-69.73 ± 5.47 (ultrasonography). Feature-level fusion of clinical and ultrasonography (accuracy, 70.29 ± 6.63 and 83.55 ± 4.32) showed similar performance with clinical features. Score-level fusion by AdaBoost showed the best performance (accuracy, 73.43 ± 6.57-83.17 ± 5.51) in the development and evaluation cohorts, respectively. This study might suggest the potential of machine learning fusion techniques to enhance the accuracy of sarcopenia prediction models and improve clinical decision-making in patients with sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.