Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38307928›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Citizen science approach to assessing patient perception of MRI with flexible radiofrequency coils.

Lena Nohava, Raphaela Czerny, Martin Tik, Dagmar Wurzer, Elmar Laistler, Roberta Frass-Kriegl

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lena Nohava *High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Raphaela Czerny *High Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin TikHigh Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6571-4413
Dagmar WurzerBundes(real)gymnasium BG/BRG Keimgasse, Mödling, Austria.
Elmar LaistlerHigh Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-8307
Roberta Frass-KrieglHigh Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. roberta.frass@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8840-4602

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) 10.55776/P37189Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) I-3618Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3618EC Horizon Europe grants no. 101078393 "MRITwins" and no. 101071008 "CITRUS" 101071008 "CITRUS"EC Horizon Europe grants no. 101078393 "MRITwins" and no. 101071008 "CITRUS" 101078393 "MRITwins"Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (Austrian Research Promotion Agency) 874196Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (Austrian Research Promotion Agency) 894985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a major medical imaging modality, which is non-invasive and provides unique soft tissue contrast without ionizing radiation. The successful completion of MRI exams critically depends on patient compliance, and, thus patient comfort. The design, appearance and usability of local MRI radiofrequency (RF) coils potentially influences the patients' perception of the exam. However, systematic investigations and empirical evidence for these aspects are missing. A questionnaire specifically evaluating the impact of RF coils on patient comfort in MRI would be a valuable addition to clinical studies comparing the performance of novel flexible RF coils with standard rigid coils. This paper describes the development of such a questionnaire in the scope of a citizen science (CS) initiative conducted with a group of students at the upper secondary school level. In this work, the CS initiative is presented in the format of a case report and its impact on scientific projects and the students' education is outlined. The resulting questionnaire is made available in German and English so as to be directly applicable by researchers working on the clinical evaluation of novel RF coils or the comfort evaluation of specific hardware setups in general.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceEquipment DesignHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPerceptionPhantoms, ImagingRadiation, IonizingRadio Waves

Identifiers

PMID38307928
PMCPMC10837436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.