ArticleScientific reports2024
Blood transcriptomics analysis offers insights into variant-specific immune response to SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Blood RNA Stability Atlas: defining temporal structure and trait-state programs in the human whole-blood transcriptome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- How Genomic and Structural Context Could Shape JAK-STAT Variant Pathogenicity.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2026Article
- Detection of Candidate Circular RNAs to Monitor Anti-Hormonal Response in the Mammary Gland.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From Home to Transcriptome: Comparing the Transcriptomic Profile of Induced Immune Response via Lipopolysaccharide Stimulation in homeRNA and Venous Blood.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Decoding coronary artery calcification: metabolic reprogramming features and a promising circulating biomarker PXDN.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Blood gene expression network expression strongly relates to brain amyloid burden.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Early Transcriptomic Signatures of Immune Response Modulation Following Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- From Home to Transcriptome: Comparing the transcriptomic profile of induced immune response via lipopolysaccharide stimulation in homeRNA and venous blood.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Severity-specific immune landscape of COVID-19 revealed by single-cell sequencing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Decoding the transcriptome from bulk RNA of infection-naïve versus imprinted patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron B.1.1.529.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Intersecting transcriptomic landscapes of hypertension and kidney function in African American women.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2025Article
- Prospective multicenter study identifying prognostic biomarkers and microbial profiles in severe CAP using BALF, blood mNGS, and PBMC transcriptomics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Data-driven projections of candidate enhancer-activating SNPs in immune regulation.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Spotlight on amino acid changing mutations in the JAK-STAT pathway: from disease-specific mutation to general mutation databases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of blood is typically used for gene expression analysis in biomedical research but is still rarely used in clinical practice. In this study, we propose that RNA-seq should be considered a diagnostic tool, as it offers not only insights into aberrant gene expression and splicing but also delivers additional readouts on immune cell type composition as well as B-cell and T-cell receptor (BCR/TCR) repertoires. We demonstrate that RNA-seq offers insights into a patient's immune status via integrative analysis of RNA-seq data from patients infected with various SARS-CoV-2 variants (in total 196 samples with up to 200 million reads sequencing depth). We compare the results of computational cell-type deconvolution methods (e.g., MCP-counter, xCell, EPIC, quanTIseq) to complete blood count data, the current gold standard in clinical practice. We observe varying levels of lymphocyte depletion and significant differences in neutrophil levels between SARS-CoV-2 variants. Additionally, we identify B and T cell receptor (BCR/TCR) sequences using the tools MiXCR and TRUST4 to show that-combined with sequence alignments and BLASTp-they could be used to classify a patient's disease. Finally, we investigated the sequencing depth required for such analyses and concluded that 10 million reads per sample is sufficient. In conclusion, our study reveals that computational cell-type deconvolution and BCR/TCR methods using bulk RNA-seq analyses can supplement missing CBC data and offer insights into immune responses, disease severity, and pathogen-specific immunity, all achievable with a sequencing depth of 10 million reads per sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.