Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38307884›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Lipoprotein apheresis affects the concentration of extracellular vesicles in patients with elevated lipoprotein (a).

Joanna Marlęga-Linert, Aleksandra Gąsecka, Edwin van der Pol, Agnieszka Kuchta, Krzysztof J Filipiak, Marcin Fijałkowski, Marcin Gruchała, Rienk Nieuwland, Agnieszka Mickiewicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Lipid-lowering agents in solid organ transplant recipients.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanna Marlęga-LinertFirst Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Aleksandra Gąsecka1St Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Edwin van der PolAmsterdam Vesicle Center and Laboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnieszka KuchtaDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Krzysztof J FilipiakInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Medical Academy in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin FijałkowskiFirst Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Marcin GruchałaFirst Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Rienk Nieuwland *Amsterdam Vesicle Center and Laboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnieszka Mickiewicz *First Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland. amickiewicz@gumed.edu.pl.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMedical University of Warsaw · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

Dutch Research Council (NWO) VIDI grant 19724Medical University of Gdansk ST/01-10023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a therapeutic option for hyperlipoproteinemia(a) (hyper-Lp(a)) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). LA improves blood rheology, reduces oxidative stress parameters and improves endothelial function. The underlying molecular mechanisms of LA beneficial effects are unknown, but it has been suggested that LA exhibits multiple activities beyond simply removing lipoproteins. We hypothesized that LA removes not only lipoproteins, but also extracellular vesicles (EVs). To test this hypothesis, we performed a prospective study in 22 patients undergoing LA for hyper-Lp(a) and ASCVD. Different EVs subtypes were measured before and directly after LA, and after 7 days. We used calibrated flow cytometry to detect total particle concentration (diameter >  ~ 100 nm), total lipoproteins concentration (diameter > 200 nm, RI > 1.51), total EV concentration (diameter > 200 nm, RI < 1.41), concentrations of EVs derived from erythrocytes (CD235a+; diameter > 200 nm, RI < 1.41), leukocytes (CD45+; diameter > 200 nm, RI < 1.41) and platelets (CD61+, PEVs; diameter > 200 nm, RI < 1.41). LA reduced the concentrations of all investigated EVs subtypes and lipoproteins. Lp(a) concentration was lowered by 64.5% [(58% - 71%); p < 0.001]. Plasma concentrations of EVs > 200 nm in diameter derived from platelets (CD61 +), leukocytes (CD45+) and erythrocytes (CD235a+) decreased after single LA procedure by 42.7% [(12.8-54.7); p = 0.005], 42.6% [(29.7-54.1); p = 0.030] and 26.7% [(1.0-62.7); p = 0.018], respectively, compared to baseline. All EV subtypes returned to the baseline concentrations in blood plasma after 7 days. To conclude, LA removes not only Lp(a), but also cell-derived EVs, which may contribute to LA beneficial effects.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisBlood Component RemovalExtracellular VesiclesHyperlipoproteinemiasHumansLipoprotein(a)Prospective StudiesLipoprotein(a)

Identifiers

PMID38307884
PMCPMC10837138
OpenAlexW4391475174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.