ArticleScientific reports2024
Increased prevalence of erythema multiforme in patients with COVID-19 infection or vaccination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Astaxanthin as an Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Agent in Human Health: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Characteristics of influenza, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV surveillance systems that utilise ICD-coded data: a systematic review.Journal of global health · 2025Pooled it
- Recurrent erythema multiforme in the setting of COVID-19 infection and oral candidiasis: A case for dysregulation of the T helper 17/interleukin 17 axis.JAAD case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Several reports stated that erythema multiforme (EM) was associated with COVID-19 with detrimental outcomes in patients. However, since most of these are case reports, it is challenging to quantitively assess their associations. Therefore, our study aims to determine the prevalence of EM in the context of COVID-19. The study was designed as a retrospective cross-sectional hospital-based study of registered patients at the University of Florida Health Hospital. The ICD-10 codes for EM, COVID-19 infection, and COVID-19 vaccines were searched in the database. The odds ratio was calculated to assess the risk of EM after COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Our study included 43,547 patients with a history of COVID-19 infection, of whom 92 developed EM. Patients with COVID-19 infection were 6.68 times more likely to have EM than those without COVID-19 (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the risk of developing EM after COVID-19 vaccination was 2.7, significantly higher than the general population (P < 0.0001). The prevalence of EM following COVID-19 infection or vaccination significantly differs from the general population, highlighting the importance of monitoring patients for EM after COVID-19 infection and/or vaccination. It is imperative to disseminate awareness to clinicians and patients regarding the impact of COVID-19 on EM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.