Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38307865›Full record

ReviewBlood cancer journal2024

GPRC5D as a novel target for the treatment of multiple myeloma: a narrative review.

Paula Rodriguez-Otero, Niels W C J van de Donk, Kodandaram Pillarisetti, Ingrid Cornax, Deeksha Vishwamitra, Kathleen Gray, Brandi Hilder, Jaszianne Tolbert, Thomas Renaud, Tara Masterson and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood cancer journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
39.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Supportive care for talquetamab-related dysgeusia in multiple myeloma: mixed-methods evidence, nutrition-focused flowchart, and digital companion concept.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Paula Rodriguez-OteroClínica Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. paurodriguez@unav.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-7785
Niels W C J van de DonkAmsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kodandaram PillarisettiJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Ingrid CornaxJanssen Research & Development, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Deeksha VishwamitraJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Kathleen GrayJanssen Scientific Affairs, Horsham, PA, USA.
Brandi HilderJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Jaszianne TolbertJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Thomas RenaudJanssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Tara MastersonJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Christoph HeuckJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Colleen KaneJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Raluca VeronaJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Philippe MoreauUniversity Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1780-8746
Nizar BahlisArnie Charbonneau Cancer Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-7034
Ajai ChariIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Janssen (United States) · USAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is a genetically complex and heterogenous malignancy with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 60%. Despite advances in therapy, patients experience cycles of remission and relapse, with each successive line of therapy associated with poorer outcomes; therefore, therapies with different mechanisms of action against new myeloma antigens are needed. G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) has emerged as a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of multiple myeloma. We review the biology and target validation of GPRC5D, and clinical data from early phase trials of GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibodies, talquetamab and forimtamig, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies, MCARH109, OriCAR-017, and BMS-986393. In addition to adverse events (AEs) associated with T-cell-redirection therapies irrespective of target, a consistent pattern of dermatologic and oral AEs has been reported across several trials of GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibodies, as well as rare cerebellar events with CAR-T therapy. Additional studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms involved in the development of skin- and oral-related toxicities. We review the strategies that have been used to manage these GPRC5D-related toxicities. Preliminary efficacy data showed overall response rates for GPRC5D-targeting T-cell-redirecting therapies were ≥64%; most responders achieved a very good partial response or better. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics showed that these therapies led to cytokine release and T-cell activation. In conclusion, results from early phase trials of GPRC5D-targeting T-cell-redirecting agents have shown promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles, including lower infection rates compared with B-cell maturation antigen- and Fc receptor-like protein 5-targeting bispecific antibodies. Further clinical trials, including those investigating GPRC5D-targeting T-cell-redirecting agents in combination with other anti-myeloma therapies and with different treatment modalities, may help to elucidate the future optimal treatment regimen and sequence for patients with multiple myeloma and improve survival outcomes. Video Summary.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificMultiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAntibodies, BispecificGPRC5D protein, humanReceptors, Chimeric AntigenReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID38307865
PMCPMC10837198
OpenAlexW4391482982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.