Observational studyJournal of pediatric nursing
Screen time and sleep duration in pediatric critical care: Secondary analysis of a pilot observational study.
Observational study in Journal of pediatric nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Sleep and Circadian Monitoring in Intensive Care Nursing: A Scoping Review.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Sleep fragmentation in critically ill children: a review of contributing factors in the pediatric intensive care unit and neurodevelopmental outcomes.Frontiers in sleep · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeQuantify and describe screen time (screen type, child engagement, adult co-viewing) in eight critically ill children and determine its association with sleep duration before (parent report) and during (actigraphy) a 24-h period in the PICU. DESIGN AND
methodsExploratory secondary analysis of 24-h video and actigraphy recordings in eight children 1-4 years old in the PICU. Videos were coded for screen time using Noldus Observer XT® software. Screen time was compared to American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations (0 h/day <2 years, ≤1 h/day 2-5 years). Parents completed the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire-Revised-Short Form (BISQ-R-SF) to understand children's pre-hospital sleep. Actigraphy was used to measure PICU sleep duration. Associations between screen time and sleep were determined with bivariate analyses.
resultsAverage age was 23.1 months (SD = 9.7). Daily screen time was 10.7 h (SD = 7), ranging from 2.4 to 21.4 h. Children (15.1% of sampling intervals) and adults (16.3%) spent little time actively engaged with screen media. BISQ-R-SF scores ranged from 48.9 to 97.7. Children had an average of 7.9 (SD = 1.2) night shift (19:00-6:59) sleep hours. Screen time was associated with worse pre-hospital sleep quality and duration with large effect sizes (r
conclusionsAll children exceeded screen time recommendations. Screen time was associated with worse pre-hospital sleep quality and duration, and decreased PICU sleep duration. Large-scale studies are needed to explore PICU screen time and sleep disruption. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should model developmentally appropriate screen media use in PICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.