Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38307710›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2024

Dextrose gel prophylaxis for neonatal hypoglycaemia and neurocognitive function at early school age: a randomised dosage trial.

Xingyu Wei, Nike Franke, Jane M Alsweiler, Gavin T L Brown, Gregory D Gamble, Alicia McNeill, Jenny Rogers, Benjamin Thompson, Jason Turuwhenua, Trecia A Wouldes and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at-risk neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Improving timing of early neonatal hypoglycemia screening in the well-baby nursery.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Xingyu WeiLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nike FrankeLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9240-3111
Jane M AlsweilerPaediatrics: Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-6654
Gavin T L BrownLearning, Development and Professional Practice, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8352-2351
Gregory D GambleLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.
Alicia McNeillLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jenny RogersLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.
Benjamin ThompsonOptometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Jason TuruwhenuaAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Trecia A WouldesDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jane E HardingLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-1422
Christopher J D McKinlayPaediatrics: Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand c.mckinlay@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1088-9467
pre-hPOD Early School-age Outcomes Study Group
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

"Two year outcomes after dextrose gel prophylaxis for neonatal hypoglycaemia"R01HD091075 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND · PI HARDING, JANE · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effect of different doses of prophylactic dextrose gel on neurocognitive function and health at 6-7 years.

designEarly school-age follow-up of the pre-hPOD (hypoglycaemia Prevention with Oral Dextrose) study.

settingSchools and communities. PATIENTS: Children born at ≥35 weeks with ≥1 risk factor for neonatal hypoglycaemia: maternal diabetes, small or large for gestational age, or late preterm.

interventionsFour interventions commencing at 1 hour of age: dextrose gel (40%) 200 mg/kg; 400 mg/kg; 200 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg repeated before three feeds (800 mg/kg); 400 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg before three feeds (1000 mg/kg); compared with equivolume placebo (combined for analysis). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Toolbox cognitive and motor batteries, as well as tests of motion perception, numeracy and cardiometabolic health, were used. The primary outcome was neurocognitive impairment, defined as a standard score of more than 1 SD below the age-corrected mean on one or more Toolbox tests.

findingsOf 392 eligible children, 309 were assessed for the primary outcome. There were no significant differences in the rate of neurocognitive impairment between those randomised to placebo (56%) and dextrose gel (200 mg/kg 46%: adjusted risk difference (aRD)=-14%, 95% CI -35%, 7%; 400 mg/kg 48%: aRD=-7%, 95% CI -27%, 12%; 800 mg/kg 45%: aRD=-14%, 95% CI -36%, 9%; 1000 mg/kg 50%: aRD=-8%, 95% CI -29%, 13%). Children exposed to any dose of dextrose gel (combined), compared with placebo, had a lower risk of motor impairment (3% vs 14%, aRD=-11%, 95% CI -19%, -3%) and higher mean (SD) cognitive scores (106.0 (15.3) vs 101.1 (15.7), adjusted mean difference=5.4, 95% CI 1.8, 8.9).

conclusionsProphylactic neonatal dextrose gel did not alter neurocognitive impairment at early school age but may have motor and cognitive benefits. Further school-age follow-up studies are needed.

Indexed as

GelsGlucoseHypoglycemiaChildCognitionDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleGelsGlucoseChild DevelopmentNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID38307710
PMCPMC11186727
OpenAlexW4391468782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.