Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38307701›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine and community health2024

Exploring conservative management for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in organised cervical cancer screening programmes: a multicentre study in Italy.

Silvia Gori, Helena Frayle, Alessio Pagan, Marika Soldà, Cesare Romagnolo, Egle Insacco, Licia Laurino, Mario Matteucci, Giuseppe Sordi, Enrico Busato and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine and community health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and prediction of its progression - a retrospective study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia GoriVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Helena FrayleVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Alessio PaganLocal Health Unit Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy.
Marika SoldàLocal Health Unit Serenissima, Venezia, Italy.
Cesare RomagnoloLocal Health Unit Serenissima, Venezia, Italy.
Egle InsaccoObstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedale Università, Padova, Italy.
Licia LaurinoLocal Health Unit Serenissima, Venezia, Italy.
Mario MatteucciObstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedale Università, Padova, Italy.
Giuseppe SordiLocal Health Unit Scaligera, Verona, Italy.
Enrico BusatoLocal Health Unit Marca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-2326
Manuel ZorziVeneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy.
Tiziano MagginoLocal Health Unit Serenissima, Venezia, Italy.
Annarosa Del MistroVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy annarosa.delmistro@iov.veneto.it.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-9374
CIN2 study Working Group
Istituto Oncologico Veneto · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · ITAzienda Ospedale - Università Padova · ITFondazione Progetto Ematologia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) lesions may regress spontaneously, offering an alternative to immediate treatment, especially for women of childbearing age (15-45 years).We conducted a prospective multicentre study on conservative CIN2 management, with semiannual follow-up visits over 24 months, biomarkers' investigation and treatment for progression to CIN3+ or CIN2 persistence for more than 12 months. Here, we assess women's willingness to participate and adherence to the study protocol.The study was set in population-based organised cervical cancer screening.From April 2019 to October 2021, 640 CIN2 cases were diagnosed in women aged 25-64 participating in the screening programmes.According to our predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 228 (35.6%) women were not eligible; 93 (22.6%) of the 412 eligible refused, and 319 (77.4%) were enrolled. Refusal for personal reasons (ie, desire to become pregnant, anxiety, difficulty in complying with the study protocol) and external barriers (ie, residence elsewhere and language problems) accounted for 71% and 17%, respectively. Only 9% expressed a preference for treatment. The primary ineligibility factor was the upper age limit of 45 years. After enrolment, 12 (4%) women without evidence of progression requested treatment, 125 (39%) were lost to follow-up (mostly after 6-12 months) and 182 (57%) remained compliant. Remarkably, 40% of enrolees did not fully adhere to the protocol, whereas only 5% (20/412) of the eligible women desired treatment.Our study demonstrates a good acceptance of conservative management for CIN2 lesions by the women, supporting its implementation within cervical screening programmes.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsConservative TreatmentEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansItalyPregnancyPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient CompliancePreventive MedicineWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID38307701
PMCPMC10840026
OpenAlexW4391487274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.