Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38307629›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2024

What if… your research is suddenly affiliated with a tobacco manufacturing company?

Wytse Bastiaan van den Bosch, Noortje Jacobs, Harm Tiddens, Suzanne van de Vathorst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wytse Bastiaan van den BoschDepartment of Paediatrics, division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0647-5552
Noortje JacobsDepartment of Medical Ethics and Philosophy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands n.jacobs@erasmusmc.nl.
Harm TiddensDepartment of Paediatrics, division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Suzanne van de VathorstDepartment of Medical Ethics and Philosophy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tobacco industry is accountable for an annual global death toll of approximately 8 million people and cigarette smoking is the foremost risk factor for several types of cancer. In addition, the tobacco industry has a long and controversial history of trying to influence scientific research and of engaging in other morally problematic practices. In September 2021, the respiratory community was alarmed by the takeover of Vectura Group (Vectura) by Philip Morris International. As a reaction to this acquisition, strict measures were imposed by the International Respiratory Societies to prohibit the involvement of Vectura in respiratory research and its participation in societies' activities. International Respiratory Societies argued that Vectura had become part of the tobacco industry due to this takeover and is, therefore, subject to the same rules and restrictions. From a healthcare and historical perspective, the reaction and imposed measures are very understandable. However, for researchers that were already affiliated with Vectura through long-standing agreements and for research that was funded by Vectura, the imposed measures have serious consequences. With this article, we provide an example of these consequences. By reflecting on this issue, we would like to start a conversation regarding the current measures and to encourage the respiratory community to begin thinking of a way to avoid these consequences in the future. In addition, we hope that with this conversation the Respiratory Societies can set an example for other medical societies on how to cope with possible morally tainted affiliations (eg, fast food companies, alcohol manufacturing companies) in the future.

Indexed as

Tobacco IndustryHumansRisk FactorsSocieties, MedicalAsthmaAsthma MechanismsLung PhysiologyPaediatric asthmaTobacco and the lung

Identifiers

PMID38307629
PMCPMC10840048
OpenAlexW4391469209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.