Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38307532›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Sepsis policy, guidelines and standards in Canada: a jurisdictional scoping review protocol.

Fatima Sheikh, Victoria Chechulina, Nick Daneman, Gary E Garber, Kathryn Hendrick, Niranjan Kissoon, Osama Loubani, Kristine Russell, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Lisa Schwartz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Fatima SheikhDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada sheikf9@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1327-2203
Victoria ChechulinaWestern University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-4078-5933
Nick DanemanTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8827-3764
Gary E GarberSafe Medical Care Research, Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kathryn HendrickCanadian Sepsis Foundation, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Niranjan KissoonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Osama LoubaniDepartments of Critical Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kristine RussellDepartment of Critical Care, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alison Fox-RobichaudMedicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9912-3606
Lisa SchwartzDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kali BarrettTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Impact · CACanadian Dermatology Foundation · CADalhousie University · CAThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo our knowledge, this study is the first to identify and describe current sepsis policies, clinical practice guidelines, and health professional training standards in Canada to inform evidence-based policy recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be designed and reported according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, Turning Research Into Practice and Policy Commons will be searched for policies, clinical practice guidelines and health professional training standards published or updated in 2010 onwards, and related to the identification, management or reporting of sepsis in Canada. Additional sources of evidence will be identified by searching the websites of Canadian organisations responsible for regulating the training of healthcare professionals and reporting health outcomes. All potentially eligible sources of evidence will be reviewed for inclusion, followed by data extraction, independently and in duplicate. The included policies will be collated and summarised to inform future evidence-based sepsis policy recommendations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed study does not require ethics approval. The results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at local, national and international forums.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicSepsisCanadaHealth PolicyHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicHealth policyINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID38307532
PMCPMC10836367
OpenAlexW4391482327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.