GuidelineNeurology2024
Guidelines for Specialized Epilepsy Centers: Executive Summary of the Report of the National Association of Epilepsy Centers Guideline Panel.
Guideline in Neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of neuroimaging modalities for epileptogenic focus localization: A systematic review.Epilepsia open · 2026Pooled it
- Genetic Diagnosis in Epilepsy: Implications for Clinical Management.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Individual-specific resting-state networks predict language dominance in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Anatomy-corrected metabolic asymmetry predicts seizure freedom after surgery in focal cortical dysplasia.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Show me the Money: Finance Models in Epilepsy Practice.Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Expanding the scope of pediatric epilepsy surgery: Access, indications, and outcomes in a modern cohort.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- What does it mean to live with epilepsy? Burden of illness from the patient perspective.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Does Missing Medication Acutely Change Seizure Risk? A Prospective Study.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- A Review of Current Research and Barriers to Access: Exploring Disparities in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery.Pediatric neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Study protocol for a prospective, cluster randomised control, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate the Reduction Of Seizures through Education and Support: the ROSES study.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
- Single-Neuron Recordings Research in Children: Ethical Considerations, Feasibility, Technical Aspects, and Scientific Opportunities.Pediatric neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Seminars in epileptology: Presurgical epilepsy evaluation.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025Review
- Individual-specific resting-state networks predict language dominance in drug-resistant epilepsy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Pediatric epilepsy division resources: scope of practice and opportunities to work at the top of your license.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2025Article
- Behavioral health resources among US pediatric epilepsy centers.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2025Article
- Frequent seizure and epilepsy-related emergency department visits in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Parent perceptions of their child's cognitive impairment linked to their views on support for healthcare transition.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Facilitators and barriers of antiseizure medication adherence from Australian healthcare providers' perspectives: A qualitative study.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Validation of the Seizure-Related Impact Assessment Scale: A Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Epilepsy.Neurology · 2025Article
- Ten-year projection of adult epilepsy burden in Australia.Epilepsia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Association of Epilepsy Centers first published the guidelines for epilepsy centers in 1990, which were last updated in 2010. Since that update, epilepsy care and the science of guideline development have advanced significantly, including the importance of incorporating a diversity of stakeholder perspectives such as those of patients and their caregivers. Currently, despite extensive published data examining the efficacy of treatments and diagnostic testing for epilepsy, there remain significant gaps in data identifying the essential services needed for a comprehensive epilepsy center and the optimal manner for their delivery. The trustworthy consensus-based statements (TCBS) process produces unbiased, scientifically valid guidelines through a transparent process that incorporates available evidence and expert opinion. A systematic literature search returned 5937 relevant studies from which 197 articles were retained for data extraction. A panel of 41 stakeholders with diverse expertise evaluated this evidence and drafted recommendations following the TCBS process. The panel reached consensus on 52 recommendations covering services provided by specialized epilepsy centers in both the inpatient and outpatient settings in major topic areas including epilepsy monitoring unit care, surgery, neuroimaging, neuropsychology, genetics, and outpatient care. Recommendations were informed by the evidence review and reflect the consensus of a broad panel of expert opinions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.