Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38306480›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Decoupling particle-impact dissipation mechanisms in 3D architected materials.

Thomas Butruille, Joshua C Crone, Carlos M Portela

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas ButruilleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Joshua C CronePhysical Modeling and Simulation Branch, DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005.ORCID 0000-0003-0856-9149
Carlos M PortelaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-2649-4235
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory · USInstitute for Soldier Nanotechnologies · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

DOD | USA | AFC | CCDC | DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (DEVCOM ARL) W911NF-23-2-0121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultralight architected materials enabled by advanced manufacturing processes have achieved density-normalized strength and stiffness properties that are inaccessible to bulk materials. However, the majority of this work has focused on static loading and elastic-wave propagation. Fundamental understanding of the mechanical behavior of architected materials under large-deformation dynamic conditions remains limited, due to the complexity of mechanical responses and shortcomings of characterization methods. Here, we present a microscale suspended-plate impact testing framework for three-dimensional micro-architected materials, where supersonic microparticles to velocities of up to 850 m/s are accelerated against a substrate-decoupled architected material to quantify its energy dissipation characteristics. Using ultra-high-speed imaging, we perform in situ quantification of the impact energetics on two types of architected materials as well as their constituent nonarchitected monolithic polymer, indicating a 47% or greater increase in mass-normalized energy dissipation under a given impact condition through use of architecture. Post-mortem characterization, supported by a series of quasi-static experiments and high-fidelity simulations, shed light on two coupled mechanisms of energy dissipation: material compaction and particle-induced fracture. Together, experiments and simulations indicate that architecture-specific resistance to compaction and fracture can explain a difference in dynamic impact response across architectures. We complement our experimental and numerical efforts with dimensional analysis which provides a predictive framework for kinetic-energy absorption as a function of material parameters and impact conditions. We envision that enhanced understanding of energy dissipation mechanisms in architected materials will serve to define design considerations toward the creation of lightweight impact-mitigating materials for protective applications.

Indexed as

architected materialsdynamic responseenergy dissipationmicrolatticesparticle impact

Identifiers

PMID38306480
PMCPMC10861910
OpenAlexW4391466998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.