ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Decoupling particle-impact dissipation mechanisms in 3D architected materials.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- In situ mechanical characterization of functional and architected materials.Nature materials · 2026Review
- Hydrogel-Based Vat Photopolymerization of Ceramics and Metals with Low Shrinkages via Repeated Infusion Precipitation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Composite Structure as a Stress Wave Barrier Zone Under Impulse Loading: Microscale Numerical Analysis of Attenuation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bioinspired twist-hyperbolic metamaterial for impact buffering and self-powered real-time sensing in UAVs.Science advances · 2025Article
- Embracing nonlinearity and geometry: a dimensional analysis guided design of shock absorbing materials.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Enhanced Deformability Through Distributed Buckling in Stiff Quasicrystalline Architected Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Reprogrammable Mechanical Metamaterials via Passive and Active Magnetic Interactions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Exploiting multiscale dynamic toughening in multicomponent alloy metamaterials for extreme impact mitigation.Science advances · 2025Article
- Enabling three-dimensional architected materials across length scales and timescales.Nature materials · 2025Review
- Superior fracture resistance and topology-induced intrinsic toughening mechanism in 3D shell-based lattice metamaterials.Science advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ultralight architected materials enabled by advanced manufacturing processes have achieved density-normalized strength and stiffness properties that are inaccessible to bulk materials. However, the majority of this work has focused on static loading and elastic-wave propagation. Fundamental understanding of the mechanical behavior of architected materials under large-deformation dynamic conditions remains limited, due to the complexity of mechanical responses and shortcomings of characterization methods. Here, we present a microscale suspended-plate impact testing framework for three-dimensional micro-architected materials, where supersonic microparticles to velocities of up to 850 m/s are accelerated against a substrate-decoupled architected material to quantify its energy dissipation characteristics. Using ultra-high-speed imaging, we perform in situ quantification of the impact energetics on two types of architected materials as well as their constituent nonarchitected monolithic polymer, indicating a 47% or greater increase in mass-normalized energy dissipation under a given impact condition through use of architecture. Post-mortem characterization, supported by a series of quasi-static experiments and high-fidelity simulations, shed light on two coupled mechanisms of energy dissipation: material compaction and particle-induced fracture. Together, experiments and simulations indicate that architecture-specific resistance to compaction and fracture can explain a difference in dynamic impact response across architectures. We complement our experimental and numerical efforts with dimensional analysis which provides a predictive framework for kinetic-energy absorption as a function of material parameters and impact conditions. We envision that enhanced understanding of energy dissipation mechanisms in architected materials will serve to define design considerations toward the creation of lightweight impact-mitigating materials for protective applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.