Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38306397›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

The geometric evolution of aortic dissections: Predicting surgical success using fluctuations in integrated Gaussian curvature.

Kameel Khabaz, Karen Yuan, Joseph Pugar, David Jiang, Seth Sankary, Sanjeev Dhara, Junsung Kim, Janet Kang, Nhung Nguyen, Kathleen Cao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic Temporal Modeling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Morphology with Z-SINDy.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Thoracic Aortic Shape: A Data-Driven Scale Space Approach.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kameel KhabazDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Karen YuanDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Joseph PugarDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
David JiangDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Seth SankaryDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Sanjeev DharaDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Junsung KimDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Janet KangDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Nhung NguyenDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Kathleen CaoDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Newell WashburnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Nicole BohrDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Cheong Jun LeeDepartment of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
Gordon KindlmannDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Ross MilnerDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Luka PocivavsekDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2652-9714

Funding

A Geometric and Morphoelastic Study of Aortic Dissection EvolutionR01HL159205 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI POCIVAVSEK, LUKA · 2021 to 2025
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical imaging modalities are a mainstay of modern disease management, but the full utilization of imaging-based data remains elusive. Aortic disease is defined by anatomic scalars quantifying aortic size, even though aortic disease progression initiates complex shape changes. We present an imaging-based geometric descriptor, inspired by fundamental ideas from topology and soft-matter physics that captures dynamic shape evolution. The aorta is reduced to a two-dimensional mathematical surface in space whose geometry is fully characterized by the local principal curvatures. Disease causes deviation from the smooth bent cylindrical shape of normal aortas, leading to a family of highly heterogeneous surfaces of varying shapes and sizes. To deconvolute changes in shape from size, the shape is characterized using integrated Gaussian curvature or total curvature. The fluctuation in total curvature (δK) across aortic surfaces captures heterogeneous morphologic evolution by characterizing local shape changes. We discover that aortic morphology evolves with a power-law defined behavior with rapidly increasing δK forming the hallmark of aortic disease. Divergent δK is seen for highly diseased aortas indicative of impending topologic catastrophe or aortic rupture. We also show that aortic size (surface area or enclosed aortic volume) scales as a generalized cylinder for all shapes. Classification accuracy for predicting aortic disease state (normal, diseased with successful surgery, and diseased with failed surgical outcomes) is 92.8±1.7%. The analysis of δK can be applied on any three-dimensional geometric structure and thus may be extended to other clinical problems of characterizing disease through captured anatomic changes.

Indexed as

AortaAortic DissectionHumans

Identifiers

PMID38306397
PMCPMC10866512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.