Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38306321›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A qualitative study examining the health system's response to COVID-19 in Sierra Leone.

Hana Stone, Emma Bailey, Haja Wurie, Andrew J M Leather, Justine I Davies, Håkon A Bolkan, Stephen Sevalie, Daniel Youkee, Divya Parmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hana StoneKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emma BaileyKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Haja WurieCollege of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Andrew J M LeatherKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Justine I DaviesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6834-1838
Håkon A BolkanCapaCare, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Stephen SevalieCollege of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Daniel YoukeeKing's Sierra Leone Partnership, Connaught Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Divya ParmarKing's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7979-3140

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W000903/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper examines the health system's response to COVID-19 in Sierra Leone. It aims to explore how the pandemic affected service delivery, health workers, patient access to services, leadership, and governance. It also examines to what extent the legacy of the 2013-16 Ebola outbreak influenced the COVID-19 response and public perception. Using the WHO Health System Building Blocks Framework, we conducted a qualitative study in Sierra Leone where semi-structured interviews were conducted with health workers, policymakers, and patients between Oct-Dec 2020. We applied thematic analysis using both deductive and inductive approaches. Twelve themes emerged from the analysis: nine on the WHO building blocks, two on patients' experiences, and one on Ebola. We found that routine services were impacted by enhanced infection prevention control measures. Health workers faced additional responsibilities and training needs. Communication and decision-making within facilities were reported to be coordinated and effective, although updates cascading from the national level to facilities were lacking. In contrast with previous health emergencies which were heavily influenced by international organisations, we found that the COVID-19 response was led by the national leadership. Experiences of Ebola resulted in less fear of COVID-19 and a greater understanding of public health measures. However, these measures also negatively affected patients' livelihoods and their willingness to visit facilities. We conclude, it is important to address existing challenges in the health system such as resources that affect the capacity of health systems to respond to emergencies. Prioritising the well-being of health workers and the continued provision of essential routine health services is important. The socio-economic impact of public health measures on the population needs to be considered before measures are implemented.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hemorrhagic Fever, EbolaDisease OutbreaksEmergenciesHumansQualitative ResearchSierra Leone

Identifiers

PMID38306321
PMCPMC10836672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.