Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38306100›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2024

Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events After Surgery for Cancer.

Johan Björklund, Juhana Rautiola, Renata Zelic, Gustaf Edgren, Matteo Bottai, Magnus Nilsson, Per Henrik Vincent, Hanna Fredholm, Henrik Falconer, Annika Sjövall and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex Differences in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Anticoagulation in malignancy: the patient who bleeds and clots simultaneously.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johan BjörklundDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Juhana RautiolaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Renata ZelicDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gustaf EdgrenClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Matteo BottaiDivision of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus NilssonDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per Henrik VincentDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hanna FredholmDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik FalconerDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Annika SjövallDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per J NilssonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter WiklundDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Markus AlyDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olof AkreDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The risks and benefits of thromboprophylaxis therapy after cancer surgery are debated. Studies that determine thrombosis risk after cancer surgery with high accuracy are needed. Objectives: To evaluate 1-year risk of venous thromboembolic events after major cancer surgery and how these events vary over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This register-based retrospective observational matched cohort study included data on the full population of Sweden between 1998 and 2016. All patients who underwent major surgery for cancer of the bladder, breast, colon or rectum, gynecologic organs, kidney and upper urothelial tract, lung, prostate, or gastroesophageal tract were matched in a 1:10 ratio with cancer-free members of the general population on year of birth, sex, and county of residence. Data were analyzed from February 13 to December 5, 2023. Exposure: Major surgery for cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was incidence of venous thromboembolic events within 1 year after the surgery. Crude absolute risks and risk differences of events within 1 year and adjusted time-dependent cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of postdischarge events were calculated. Results: A total of 432 218 patients with cancer (median age, 67 years [IQR, 58-75 years]; 68.7% women) and 4 009 343 cancer-free comparators (median age, 66 years [IQR, 57-74 years]; 69.3% women) were included in the study. The crude 1-year cumulative risk of pulmonary embolism was higher among the cancer surgery population for all cancers, with the following absolute risk differences: for bladder cancer, 2.69 percentage points (95% CI, 2.33-3.05 percentage points); for breast cancer, 0.59 percentage points (95% CI 0.55-0.63 percentage points); for colorectal cancer, 1.57 percentage points (95% CI, 1.50-1.65 percentage points); for gynecologic organ cancer, 1.32 percentage points (95% CI, 1.22-1.41 percentage points); for kidney and upper urinary tract cancer, 1.38 percentage points (95% CI, 1.21-1.55 percentage points); for lung cancer, 2.61 percentage points (95% CI, 2.34-2.89 percentage points); for gastroesophageal cancer, 2.13 percentage points (95% CI, 1.89-2.38 percentage points); and for prostate cancer, 0.57 percentage points (95% CI, 0.49-0.66 percentage points). The cause-specific HR of pulmonary embolism comparing patients who underwent cancer surgery with matched comparators peaked just after discharge and generally plateaued 60 to 90 days later. At 30 days after surgery, the HR was 10 to 30 times higher than in the comparison cohort for all cancers except breast cancer (colorectal cancer: HR, 9.18 [95% CI, 8.03-10.50]; lung cancer: HR, 25.66 [95% CI, 17.41-37.84]; breast cancer: HR, 5.18 [95% CI, 4.45-6.05]). The hazards subsided but never reached the level of the comparison cohort except for prostate cancer. Similar results were observed for deep vein thrombosis. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found an increased rate of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer surgery. The risk persisted for about 2 to 4 months postoperatively but varied between cancer types. The increased rate is likely explained by the underlying cancer disease and adjuvant treatments. The results highlight the need for individualized venous thromboembolism risk evaluation and prophylaxis regimens for patients undergoing different surgery for different cancers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleLung NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsPulmonary EmbolismVenous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisAftercareAgedAnticoagulantsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID38306100
PMCPMC10837742
OpenAlexW4391487115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.