Observational studyJAMA network open2024
Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events After Surgery for Cancer.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of extended thromboprophylaxis after colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- Tranexamic acid in radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Preoperative Laboratory, Imaging, and Risk Assessment Before Elective Colorectal Cancer Resection: What the Clinician Must Remember.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Risk Factors for Deep Vein Thrombosis After Surgery in Patients with Gastric or Colorectal Cancer Receiving Anticoagulant Prophylaxis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Time-Dependent Association Between Breast Cancer and Risk of Ischemic Stroke: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Neurology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Perioperative Implications of Cardiovascular Comorbidities in Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Three-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Challenges in Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification After Pancreatic and Liver Cancer Surgery Using Claims Data.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Patient perspectives on post-operative direct oral anticoagulant for venous thromboembolism prevention in patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing laparotomy.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Incidence and Predictors of Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Urologic Cancer Surgery: Toward Risk-Stratified, Personalized Prophylaxis Strategies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- [Lung Cancer with Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence-based Progress in Anticoagulation Assessment and Management].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Review
- Anticoagulation in malignancy: the patient who bleeds and clots simultaneously.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
- Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis in cancer-related surgeries: A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Risk Score for Prophylaxis Guidance of Postoperative Pulmonary Embolism in Laryngopharyngeal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Observational
- Article
- Venous thromboembolism risk for patients with BMI ≥40 kg/mGynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- A noncanonical role of SAT1 enables anchorage independence and peritoneal metastasis in ovarian cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery compliance on postoperative venous thromboembolism.BJS open · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model and web calculator for postoperative LDVT in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The risks and benefits of thromboprophylaxis therapy after cancer surgery are debated. Studies that determine thrombosis risk after cancer surgery with high accuracy are needed. Objectives: To evaluate 1-year risk of venous thromboembolic events after major cancer surgery and how these events vary over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This register-based retrospective observational matched cohort study included data on the full population of Sweden between 1998 and 2016. All patients who underwent major surgery for cancer of the bladder, breast, colon or rectum, gynecologic organs, kidney and upper urothelial tract, lung, prostate, or gastroesophageal tract were matched in a 1:10 ratio with cancer-free members of the general population on year of birth, sex, and county of residence. Data were analyzed from February 13 to December 5, 2023. Exposure: Major surgery for cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was incidence of venous thromboembolic events within 1 year after the surgery. Crude absolute risks and risk differences of events within 1 year and adjusted time-dependent cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of postdischarge events were calculated. Results: A total of 432 218 patients with cancer (median age, 67 years [IQR, 58-75 years]; 68.7% women) and 4 009 343 cancer-free comparators (median age, 66 years [IQR, 57-74 years]; 69.3% women) were included in the study. The crude 1-year cumulative risk of pulmonary embolism was higher among the cancer surgery population for all cancers, with the following absolute risk differences: for bladder cancer, 2.69 percentage points (95% CI, 2.33-3.05 percentage points); for breast cancer, 0.59 percentage points (95% CI 0.55-0.63 percentage points); for colorectal cancer, 1.57 percentage points (95% CI, 1.50-1.65 percentage points); for gynecologic organ cancer, 1.32 percentage points (95% CI, 1.22-1.41 percentage points); for kidney and upper urinary tract cancer, 1.38 percentage points (95% CI, 1.21-1.55 percentage points); for lung cancer, 2.61 percentage points (95% CI, 2.34-2.89 percentage points); for gastroesophageal cancer, 2.13 percentage points (95% CI, 1.89-2.38 percentage points); and for prostate cancer, 0.57 percentage points (95% CI, 0.49-0.66 percentage points). The cause-specific HR of pulmonary embolism comparing patients who underwent cancer surgery with matched comparators peaked just after discharge and generally plateaued 60 to 90 days later. At 30 days after surgery, the HR was 10 to 30 times higher than in the comparison cohort for all cancers except breast cancer (colorectal cancer: HR, 9.18 [95% CI, 8.03-10.50]; lung cancer: HR, 25.66 [95% CI, 17.41-37.84]; breast cancer: HR, 5.18 [95% CI, 4.45-6.05]). The hazards subsided but never reached the level of the comparison cohort except for prostate cancer. Similar results were observed for deep vein thrombosis. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found an increased rate of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer surgery. The risk persisted for about 2 to 4 months postoperatively but varied between cancer types. The increased rate is likely explained by the underlying cancer disease and adjuvant treatments. The results highlight the need for individualized venous thromboembolism risk evaluation and prophylaxis regimens for patients undergoing different surgery for different cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.