Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38306068›Full record

ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2024

Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for glioma grade using machine learning.

Mingzhen Wu, Jixin Luan, Di Zhang, Hua Fan, Lishan Qiao, Chuanchen Zhang

Expression of concernAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mingzhen WuDepartment of Radiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, China.
Jixin LuanDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Di ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, China.
Hua FanDepartment of Radiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, China.
Lishan QiaoSchool of Mathematics, Liaocheng University, Shandong, China.
Chuanchen ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, China.
Liaocheng People's Hospital · CNAcademy of Medical Sciences · GBLiaocheng University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistopathological evaluation is currently the gold standard for grading gliomas; however, this technique is invasive.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a diagnostic prediction model for glioma by employing multiple machine learning algorithms to identify risk factors associated with high-grade glioma, facilitating the prediction of glioma grading.

methodsData from 1114 eligible glioma patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, which was divided into a training set (n= 781) and a test set (n= 333). Fifty machine learning algorithms were employed, and the optimal algorithm was selected to construct a prediction model. The performance of the machine learning prediction model was compared to the clinical prediction model in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical validity to assess the performance of the prediction model.

resultsThe area under the curve (AUC) values of the machine learning prediction models (training set: 0.870 vs. 0.740, test set: 0.863 vs. 0.718) were significantly improved from the clinical prediction models. Furthermore, significant improvement in discrimination was observed for the Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) (training set: 0.230, test set: 0.270) and Net Reclassification Index (NRI) (training set: 0.170, test set: 0.170) from the clinical prognostic model. Both models showed a high goodness of fit and an increased net benefit.

conclusionA strong prediction accuracy model can be developed using machine learning algorithms to screen for high-grade glioma risk predictors, which can serve as a non-invasive prediction tool for preoperative diagnostic grading of glioma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaMachine LearningNeoplasm GradingAdultAgedAlgorithmsArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsGliomagradingmachine learningprediction modelrisk predictors

Identifiers

PMID38306068
OpenAlexW4391470523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.