ArticleEndocrine2024
Surgical outcome after thyroidectomy due to Graves' disease and Lugol iodine treatment: a retrospective register-based cohort study.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Preoperative Lugol's solution and surgical outcomes in Graves' disease: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between Lugol iodine treatment in a rescue setting and surgical outcomes in Graves' disease patients.
methodsThe retrospective register-based cohort study included 813 patients who had undergone primary total thyroidectomy with a primary diagnosis of Graves' disease (ICD-code E05.0) at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, between January 2008 and December 2015. Of 813 patients, 33 (4.1%) were given Lugol iodine before surgery and the remaining, the non-Lugol group, did not. The study's primary outcomes were post-operative calcium treatment day 1, calcium and vitamin D supplements at discharge and follow-up. Secondary outcomes were laryngeal nerve damage and bleeding (defined as re-operation).
resultsDifferences were found between the Lugol and non-Lugol groups in the treatment of calcium day 1 (45.5% vs 26.7%, p = 0.018), at discharge (36.4% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.002) and vitamin D supplements at discharge (36.4% vs. 19.1%, p = 0.015) as surrogate variables for hypocalcemia post-operatively. No differences could be seen at 4-6 weeks and six-months follow-up. There were no differences between the Lugol and non-Lugol groups in terms of operation time, laryngeal nerve damage, and bleeding.
conclusionPatients in our cohort undergoing thyroidectomy due to Graves' disease pre-operatively treated with Lugol iodine as a rescue therapy had a higher risk of experiencing short term post-operative hypocalcemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.