ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2024
[Onboarding in intensive care and emergency medicine in Germany].
Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Core curriculum of intensive care and emergency medicine in internal medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- [Onboarding in emergency medicine : Methods, challenges and opportunities].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- [Working conditions in German intensive care units-A cross-professional analysis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of acute life-threatening conditions in intensive care and emergency medicine requires in-depth training and education, with initial training playing a key role. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the structure and quality of the initial training of physicians and nurses in intensive care units and emergency departments in Germany?
methodsWith the help of survey software, an online questionnaire comprising 40 questions in German on the aforementioned topic was designed. It was distributed via the website of the German Society for Internal Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN) and via pertinent social media channels.
resultsIn total, 103 nurses and 125 physicians participated in the survey. The average work experience of the participating nurses and physicians was 8.5 ± 5.1 and 3.0 ± 3.1 years, respectively. The majority of participants worked primarily in intensive care units (59%) or in emergency departments (22%). On average, the initial training lasted 45 ± 27 and 13 ± 13 days for nurses and physicians, respectively. Only 20% of the initial training comprised seminars or hands-on workshops taught outside of routine clinical care. In all, 47% of the participants stated that they were not able to complete the entire initial training period. Only 49% had been officially certified for usage of the technical equipment in their department. A total of 35% reported feeling confident or somewhat confident in handling predictable tasks after initial training, but only 15% in handling acute emergencies. DISCUSSION: The present study revealed that initial training in intensive care and emergency medicine is frequently incomplete, unstructured, as well as inadequate and bears both safety and liability risks. New concepts are needed to improve the initial training across clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.