ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2024
Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT to Accurately Simplify Patient-centered Information about Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening.
Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of Large Language Models for Congenital Microtia Reconstruction Education: Comparison of the Performance of Claude, GPT, and Gemini.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Patient and clinician engagement with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI): A scoping review of implications for patient-centered communication.Patient education and counseling · 2026Article
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Diagnostic Accuracy and Health Information Quality in Oral Mucosal Diseases.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Radiologist-Patient Communication: A Narrative Review for Clinical Practice.Cureus · 2026Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Popular Gen-AI Chatbots in Generating Patient Education Material on Pulmonary Artery Catheter Insertion.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2026Article
- The Use of ChatGPT-4.0 to Simplify Breast Pathology Reports: A Study on Readability and Accuracy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Best Practices for the Safe Use of Large Language Models and Other Generative AI in Radiology.Radiology · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Quality and Understandability of Radiology Report Summaries Generated by ChatGPT: Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Large Language Model Guidance for Patients on Breast Cancer Surgery Preparation and Recovery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Bridging knowledge gaps in breast cancer prevention: Insights from Ethiopia.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Preoperative Patient Education in Superior Capsular Reconstruction: Comparative Study of Claude, GPT, and Gemini.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating evidence-based health information from generative AI using a cross-sectional study with laypeople seeking screening information.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing ChatGPT responses to patient questions on epidural steroid injections: A comparative study of general vs specific queries.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating text and visual diagnostic capabilities of large language models on questions related to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas 5Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Observational
- Precision Oncology in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparative Study of Contextualized ChatGPT Models.Cureus · 2025Article
- Enhancing Patient Comprehension of Glomerular Disease Treatments Using ChatGPT.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- To trust or not to trust: evaluating the reliability and safety of AI responses to laryngeal cancer queries.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- [Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Guide for Radiologists].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Review
- Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Virtual Assistant and Large Language Models in Post-Operative Care.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the use of ChatGPT as a tool to simplify answers to common questions about breast cancer prevention and screening. Materials and Methods In this retrospective, exploratory study, ChatGPT was requested to simplify responses to 25 questions about breast cancer to a sixth-grade reading level in March and August 2023. Simplified responses were evaluated for clinical appropriateness. All original and simplified responses were assessed for reading ease on the Flesch Reading Ease Index and for readability on five scales: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Automated Readability Index, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (ie, SMOG) Index. Mean reading ease, readability, and word count were compared between original and simplified responses using paired
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.