ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2024
Patient-specific finite element modeling for fracture risk prediction in a canine model of osteosarcoma.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In cancer patients with bone tumors, pathological fractures are a major concern. Making treatment decision for these patients requires an evaluation of fracture risk, which is currently based on semi-qualitative criteria that lack patient-specificity. Because of this, there exists a need for quantitative fracture risk prediction tailored to the patient's individual bone geometry. To address this need, this study aims to develop and validate a finite element (FE) technique that can be used to create patient-specific models and more accurately identify fracture risk. Model validation was performed using canine radii. Methods: Radii were harvested from eight canines euthanized for reasons unrelated to the study. A semicircular osteotomy was made in the distal portion of each bone to simulate tumor lysis. Samples underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning and were randomly assigned to loading groups for destructive mechanical testing. Three samples were tested in torsion, three in cantilever bending, and two in compression. FE models were created for each bone from the corresponding CT scan to replicate patient-specific geometry. Material properties were based on equations relating scan properties to elastic modulus. Boundary conditions and loads were added to the models based on the sample's treatment group. Stiffness and strain data were collected from both the mechanical testing and FE simulation, and yield load predictions were made based on maximum principal strain. Experimental and computational results were compared using a linear regression. Results: The FE models were most accurate in predicting stiffness, followed by strain, with yield load having the lowest accuracy. Linear regressions resulted in R2 values of 0.9335 for bending and compression and 0.8798 for torsion. Conclusions: The proposed FE technique is a valid method for predicting fracture in a canine model of osteosarcoma. This method could provide patient-specific, quantitative data to aid clinicians in decisions regarding surgical intervention for patients with bone tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.