Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304895›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2024

Autogenous breast reconstruction for total mastectomies: a narrative review.

Romain Laurent, Alexandru Trifan, Arthur David Danino, Laurence S Paek, Ramy Schoucair, Julien Pauchot, Christina Bernier, Etienne Briand, Michel A Danino

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Romain LaurentDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Alexandru TrifanFaculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Arthur David DaninoDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Laurence S PaekDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Ramy SchoucairDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Julien PauchotUniversity Hospital Centre of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Christina BernierDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Etienne BriandUniversity Hospital Centre of Martinique, Fort-de-France, France.
Michel A DaninoDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique · MQMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Mastectomies have a significant socio-psychological impact, motivating patients to undergo breast reconstruction. Initially, silicone implants were used to reconstruct the breast. However, breast implants have been the subject of successive crises throughout the years. Indeed, rupture, silicone bleeding, and capsular contracture remain topical. In 2019, the BIOCELL textured breast implants was banned and recalled due to the discovery of the breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). More recently, the breast implant illness has been depicted in the media. To cope with these issues and to respond to some patients' expectations for a natural reconstruction, plastic surgeons have developed autogenous solutions for breast reconstruction. Since Taylor's research on angiosomes, the development of the microsurgery and more recently fat grafting, autogenous breast reconstruction has known a tremendous expansion. Autologous breast reconstruction allows a more natural feeling and texture. This narrative review aims to provide to the readers a comprehensive and updated evidence-based overview of state of the art about autologous breast reconstruction after total mastectomy. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature searching for papers published between January 2010 and December 2022. The MeSH terms with different combinations were used to identify articles for inclusion. After screening article titles and abstracts independently by three authors, 66 papers were included in this review. Key Content and Findings: In this review, the authors describe and discuss the different autogenous techniques in breast reconstruction. Conclusions: Autologous reconstructions provide very satisfactory, durable, and reliable results with relatively low complication rates. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, latissimus dorsi flaps and autologous fat grafting are the most common type of autogenous breast reconstructions.

Indexed as

autologous breast reconstructionautologous fat graftingBreast reconstructionflaps

Identifiers

PMID38304895
PMCPMC10777237
OpenAlexW4389748463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.