ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2024
RELAY, Erlotinib Plus Ramucirumab in Untreated,
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prolonged complete metabolic response to chemotherapy combined with amivantamab with high grade cutaneous toxicity after osimertinib resistance in an uncommonTranslational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- EGFR-Mutant Urothelial Carcinoma Harboring an Ala750_Ile759delinsGlyGly Alteration with a Primary Resistance to Polychemotherapy and a Sensitivity to Osimertinib: A Literature Review on EGFR Alterations and Response to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A Structural Insight Into Two Important ErbB Receptors (EGFR and HER2) and Their Relevance to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: Patients (N = 449) were randomized (1:1) to RAM plus ERL or PBO plus ERL. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at 30-day post-study treatment discontinuation follow-up. Baseline and treatment-emergent gene alterations were investigated by Guardant360 next-generation sequencing. Patients with a valid baseline plasma sample and ex19del were included (RAM + ERL, n = 62; PBO + ERL, n = 72). Results: The most common ex19del variant was E746_A750del (67.2%); Conclusions: RAM plus ERL provides benefit and improves treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.