ArticleHeliyon2024
Improved detection of aortic dissection in non-contrast-enhanced chest CT using an attention-based deep learning model.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer vision applications in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Performance of image-based deep learning models for aortic dissection segmentation and diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- New Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Radiomics in Non-Contrast CT for Aortic Dissection: A Case Report and Literature Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in aortic CT angiography: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Application of MRI image segmentation algorithm for brain tumors based on improved YOLO.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: This study investigated the effects of implementing an attention-based deep learning model for the detection of aortic dissection (AD) using non-contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT). Materials and methods: We analysed the records of 1300 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT at 2 medical centres between January 2015 and February 2023. We considered an internal cohort of 200 patients with AD and 200 patients without AD and an external test cohort of 40 patients with AD and 40 patients without AD. The internal cohort was divided into training and test sets, and a deep learning model was trained using 9600 CT images. A convolutional block attention module (CBAM) and a traditional deep learning architecture (namely, You Only Look Once version 5 [YOLOv5]) were combined into an attention-based model (i.e., YOLOv5-CBAM). Its performance was measured against the unmodified YOLOv5 model, and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the algorithm were evaluated by two independent radiologists. Results: The CBAM-based model outperformed the traditional deep learning model. In the external testing set, YOLOv5-CBAM achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.938, accuracy of 91.5 %, sensitivity of 90.0 %, and specificity of 92.9 %, whereas the unmodified model achieved an AUC of 0.844, accuracy of 83.6 %, sensitivity of 71.2 %, and specificity of 96.0 %. The sensitivity results of the unmodified algorithms were not significantly different from those of the radiologists; however, the proposed YOLOv5-CBAM algorithm outperformed the unmodified algorithms in terms of detection. Conclusions: Incorporating the CBAM attention mechanism into a deep learning model can significantly improve AD detection in non-contrast-enhanced chest CT. This approach may aid radiologists in the timely and accurate diagnosis of AD, which is important for improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.