ReviewHeliyon2024
The clinical utilization of SNIP1 and its pathophysiological mechanisms in disease.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- RNF113A Promotes Colorectal Cancer Metastasis by Regulating TGF-β Pathway and EMT via Ubiquitin-Mediated Degradation of SNIP1.Balkan medical journal · 2026Article
- Phosphorylation of SF3B1 by CDK11 orchestrates spliceosome activation via SNIP1-dependent RES complex recruitment.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic comparison of corneal endothelial cells in young versus old corneas.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smad intranuclear binding protein 1 (SNIP1), a highly conserved nuclear protein, functions as a transcriptional regulator and exerts a significant influence on disease progression. In addition, the N-terminal domain of SNIP1 facilitates its interaction with Smad4, a signaling protein associated with the TGF-β family, and RelA/p65, a transcription factor connected to NF-κB. This interaction further enhances the transcriptional activation of c-Myc-dependent genes. Presently, the primary emphasis in research is directed towards targeting the catalytic domain of SNIP1, as it holds promise as a potential therapeutic target for various diseases. While the significance of SNIP1 in pathological mechanisms remains uncertain, this review aims to comprehensively examine the existing literature on the association between SNIP1 and proteins implicated in the regulation of diverse clinical conditions, including cancer, inflammation, and related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.