ArticleHeliyon2024
Qualification of a flow cytometry-based method for the evaluation of
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Natural Killer (NK) cell-based therapies represent a ground-breaking opportunity for the treatment of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. NK cell manufacturing under good manufacturing practice (GMP) is complex and requires attentive assessment the product's safety and efficacy through quality control (QC). Release testing includes monitoring of Methods: First, we established multi-color flow cytometry panels to quantitatively determine the count of effector (E) GTA002 cells and leukemia target (T) K562 cells alone and in co-culture at different E:T ratios (10:1, 3:1, 1:1). Effector potency was then qualitatively expressed as percentage of cytotoxicity. Next, we defined protocols for method qualification to assess the pivotal features of the assays, including accuracy, precision, linearity, range, specificity, robustness, and carryover; quantitative acceptance criteria were determined for all parameters. Results of the qualification procedure are reported and discussed against pre-defined acceptance criteria. Results: Overall, our methods show robust performance across all parameters, ensuring QC-compliant assessment of NK cell potency as part of the release test panel for clinical batches. Notably, we identified relevant aspects to address when progressing towards method validation to support pivotal clinical studies. Conclusions: This article provides a "case-study" of how analytical method development for cell therapeutics is planned and executed from early clinical stages, anticipating the need to establish robust procedures to overcome scientific and regulatory challenges during method validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.