ArticleHeliyon2024
Validation of a newly developed immunoassay for TDP-43 in human plasma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular signatures and biomarker development for limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE).Acta neuropathologica · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- TDP-43 seeding activity in the olfactory mucosa of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025Article
- Development of a Sensitive and Reliable Meso Scale Discovery-Based Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay to Quantify TDP-43 in Human Biofluids.Biosensors · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The level of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) in human blood was reported to have potential for use as a specific fluid biomarker, which represents disease-specific pathologies, for TDP-43 proteinopathies, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), which involves the aggregation and deposition of TDP-43 in the nervous system. However, at present, no reliable immunoassay can precisely quantify TDP-43 in human plasma and detect the difference in plasma TDP-43 levels between patients with ALS and controls. We recently developed a novel ultrasensitive immunoassay to quantify TDP-43 in human plasma, and in this study, we analytically validated this assay for application as a diagnostic biomarker for TDP-43 proteinopathies. The novel TDP-43 assay was assessed for the limit of detection, lower limit of quantification, intra- and interassay variation, linearity, parallelism, and analytical spike recoveries. Additionally, 17 pilot plasma samples obtained from patients with ALS and age-matched controls were analyzed using the assay. Our novel TDP-43 assay showed sufficient analytical performance to quantify TDP-43 in human plasma, with high sensitivity (LOD and LLOQ of 0.109 and 0.759 pg/mL, respectively) and high intra- and interassay precision (%CV) below 15 %. The experimental results for spike recovery, parallelism, and dilution linearity were also acceptable. In addition, despite a small sample size, significant differences in the plasma levels of TDP-43 were found between patients with ALS and controls (ALS, 66.63 ± 20.52 pg/mL; control, 42.70 ± 23.06 pg/mL, p = 0.0330). These results support that our novel TDP-43 assay is a reliable and innovative method for the quantification of TDP-43 in human plasma and can be a potential blood-based biomarker for the diagnosis of TDP-43 proteinopathies. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate its usefulness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.