Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304715›Full record

ArticleEuropean clinical respiratory journal2024

National survey on management of spontaneous pneumothorax from emergency department to specialised treatment: room for improvement.

Søren Helbo Skaarup, Christian B Laursen, Rob J Hallifax, Beenish Iqbal, Uffe Bødtger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European clinical respiratory journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. New strategies in the management of pneumothorax.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Søren Helbo SkaarupDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, University Hospital. The Danish Respiratory Society's interest group for pleural diseases, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christian B LaursenOdense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Rob J HallifaxOxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Beenish IqbalOxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Uffe BødtgerRespiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde & Næstved, Zealand, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKChurchill Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) affects both young, otherwise healthy individuals and older persons with known underlying pulmonary disease. Initial management possibilities are evolving and range from observation to chest tube insertion. SP guidelines suggest an individualized approach based on multiple factors such as symptoms, size of pneumothorax, comorbidity and patient preference. Aim: With this Danish national survey we aimed to map organization of care including involved specialties, treatment choice, training, and follow-up plans to identify aspects, and optimization of spontaneous pneumothorax management. Method: A survey developed by the national interest group for pleural medicine was sent to all departments of emergency medicine, thoracic surgery, respiratory medicine, and to relevant departments of abdominal or orthopaedic surgery. Results: The response rate was 75 % (47 of 65). Overall, 21% of responding departments had no guideline for SP management, which was provided by multiple specialties with marked heterogeneity in choice of treatment including tube size, management during admission, and referral procedure to follow-up. Few departments required procedure training, and nearly all of the responders called for improvements in management of pneumothorax. Conclusion: This survey suggests that SP management and care is delivered heterogeneously across Danish hospitals with marked difference between respiratory physicians, emergency physicians, general surgeons and thoracic surgeons. It is therefore likely that management is sub-optimal. There is a need for a common Danish SP guideline to ensure optimal treatment across involved specialties.

Indexed as

Choice of chest tube typeClinical decision makingNational surveyOptimizing treatment needsProcedure trainingSpontaneous pneumothorax

Identifiers

PMID38304715
PMCPMC10833110
OpenAlexW4391383625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.