ArticleCureus2024
Comparing Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: Advantages and Limitations for Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled Trial: Improving Glucose Time-in-Range in Diabetes in African Youth (DAYTime).Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Can Glucose Alarm Fatigue Threaten the Absolute Clinical Benefit of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Optimal Glucose Management in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes? A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Health Technology Assessment of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems for Paediatric Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Supporting Glycemic Control Among Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives We aimed to determine the benefits and drawbacks of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) compared with those of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their impact on glycemic control, hypo- and hyperglycemic episodes, exercise, quality of life, and psychosocial factors. Methodology This quantitative, comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2022 and March 2023 at the Pediatric Endocrine Outpatient Clinic, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Data were obtained via a clinical interview with children and adolescents with T1D aged 2-18 years. Results The study involved 121 participants, with 71 (58.7%) male patients and 50 (41.3%) female patients. The participants' mean age was 11.9 ± 4.4 years. Compared with patients using SMBG, patients using rtCGM demonstrated a more significant decrease in the mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from baseline (7.79 ± 1.17 vs. 8.92 ± 1.63,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.