Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304658›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Prevalence of Intimidation of Medical Students in the Clinical Years by the Staff at a Saudi Arabian University.

Bandar M Hetaimish

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bandar M HetaimishOrthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, SAU.
University of Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimidation of medical students by the staff appears to be an evolving problem. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of intimidation among medical students by the staff, identify the types of intimidation that exist, and recognize the barriers that stand in the way of reporting any incident of intimidation.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students in their clinical and final years at the College of Medicine, Taibah University (TU), Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia. Students were invited to voluntarily complete an anonymous survey that explored students' exposure to any type of intimidation, including verbal, physical, and sexual abuse, and academic intimidation.

resultsA total of 311 medical students participated in our study, with 164 females and 147 males. Of these, 187 (60.1%) students reported having received some sort of intimidation. The most testified type of intimidation was verbal abuse (165, 53.1%). Following that, in order of frequency, were academic intimidation (101, 32.5%), physical intimidation (25, 8.0%), and sexual abuse (13, 4.2%).

conclusionOur study revealed a high rate of intimidation between the staff and medical students at our institution. Verbal abuse was the most popular type of intimidation. Promoting a more positive learning environment for medical students by managing the teacher-student relationship is crucial to improving students' learning outcomes. Medical schools should resist intimidation through strict guidelines.

Indexed as

abuseintimidationlearningmedical studentssaudi arabia

Identifiers

PMID38304658
PMCPMC10832306
OpenAlexW4390508764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.