ArticleCureus2024
Gynecomastia on Thoracic Computed Tomography.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Gynecomastia is a benign proliferation of ductal epithelium in the retroareolar region in male patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of gynecomastia in male patients who underwent thoracic computed tomography (CT) imaging at our clinic, assess possible causes, highlight the imaging characteristics of gynecomastia, and compare our findings with the literature. Materials and methods Male patients over 18 years of age who underwent thoracic CT imaging in our clinic were included in the study. Patients were initially assessed based on age and the presence of gynecomastia. The patients with gynecomastia were evaluated in terms of age, gynecomastia localization (right, left, and bilateral), gynecomastia type (nodular, dentritic, and diffuse), and possible etiology. Results The study included 1500 patients with a mean age of 45.6±21.7 years, and 470 (31.3%) patients had gynecomastia. Gynecomastia was on the right side in 11.3%, on the left side in 11.1%, and bilateral in 77.7% of the patients. Gynecomastia was nodular in 52.1%, dendritic in 35.3%, and diffuse in 17.2% of the patients. The causative factor could not be identified in 44.3% of the patients with gynecomastia. Among cases where the etiology was identified (56.7%), the most common factors were cancer (23.4%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (13.2%), and chronic hepatitis B (10.7%). Conclusion When evaluating thoracic CT, the breast area, in addition to the lungs, chest wall, and bone structures, should also be evaluated carefully. With the increased use of thoracic CT scans, incidentally detected gynecomastia in patients is also on the rise. Knowing the presence of gynecomastia is very important for the clinician to determine the etiology and treat the underlying disease. Therefore, detecting and reporting gynecomastia on thoracic CT can prevent unnecessary advanced breast imaging methods and play a very important role in treating the underlying etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.