ArticleCureus2024
Factors Associated With the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Family Medicine Physicians, Compared With Women of the Community in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer is the ninth diagnosed cancer among Saudi women. The majority of cervical cancer cases occur in women who did not undergo screening. However, the screening rates in several countries, including Saudi Arabia, remain suboptimal. It is important to identify the factors associated with the uptake of screening and predictors of screening in order to increase the uptake rate.
aimTo determine the factors associated with the uptake of cervical cancer screening among family medicine physicians (FMPs), compared with women of the community.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted in the central region (Riyadh), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from February 2021 for 12 months on female physicians and women of the community. An electronic questionnaire was used to investigate the demographics of women and variables related to the uptake of screening.
resultsA total of 126 FMP and 127 women from the community were included. The factors affecting screening among FMP included age (P=0.013), health insurance (P=0.002), availability of Pap smear (P˂0.001), and physician encouragement (P˂0.001). The factors affecting the screening of community women included the availability of Pap smears (P˂0.001) and physician encouragement (P˂0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that physician encouragement of Pap smear was a significant predictor of screening among FMP (OR=8.26, P˂0.001) and community women (OR=6.67, P˂0.001). The perceived benefit was the only predictor for screening among FMP (OR=0.75, P=0.004).
conclusionThe uptake of cervical cancer screening was higher in the community women. The factors linked to the uptake differed among the two groups, but the support of doctors played a significant role in the likelihood of uptake, regardless of the group of women. It is recommended to enhance the guidance of medical personnel in recommending screening during clinic visits for the specific target group. Additionally, there should be increased education on the significance of screening and efforts to educate the community about cervical cancer and screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.