ArticleOphthalmology science
The Visual Impairment of Inherited Retinal Diseases in Portugal as per the National Table of Disabilities.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and genetic landscape of IRD in Portugal: pooled data from the nationwide IRD-PT registry.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- The socioeconomic epidemiology of inherited retinal diseases in Portugal.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the visual impairment of patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs), as per the national table of disabilities (TNI). Design: Retrospective, single-center cohort study. Participants: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of IRD were recruited at a referral center in Portugal. Methods: Demographics and clinical data were collected from each individual patient file. The estimated visual disability coefficient was calculated through the evaluation of 7 graduated categories: orbital or eyelid deformities, low vision, visual field change, loss of bi-foveolar fixation, oculomotor palsy, photophobia, and chronic conjunctivitis. The TNI provides minimum and maximum disability values for numerous conditions within each category, which were summed to calculate an overall summary disability coefficient for each patient. Main Outcome Measures: Demographic/clinical and estimated minimum and maximum visual disability coefficient according to the TNI for each patient. Results: This study included 253 patients from 214 families, aged 3 to 80 years, with a mean age of 39.8 ± 20.0 years. The mean estimated minimum and maximum visual disability coefficients as per the TNI were 0.6 ± 0.4 and 0.7 ± 0.4, respectively. The low vision was the single most frequent contributor category (21.7%) present in the calculation of visual impairment. Low vision and visual field changes were the most frequent double combination (18.2%), and the addition of loss of bi-foveolar fixation was the most frequent triple combination (8.3%). Conclusions: This study found that IRD patients had a significant visual disability, with the majority having a disability coefficient ≥0.6, which would qualify them for a "multipurpose disability medical certificate." Financial Disclosures: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.