ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2024
Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: How Can the Radiologist Help the Surgeon.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2026Article
- Editorial for the special issue "Pancreatic imaging: Recent advancements and new frontiers".European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) - A global definition with variable regional recognition.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2025Article
- Postoperative Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreatic Resections-A Narrative Review and a Diagnostic Algorithm.Cancers · 2025Review
- Radiological Assessment After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for a Precision Approach to Managing Complications: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Optimized Spatial Transformer for Segmenting Pancreas Abnormalities.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Cross-sectional imaging of pancreatic leak: a pictorial review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is nowadays considered one of the most complex surgical approaches and not unscathed from complications. After the surgical procedure, cross-sectional imaging is considered the non-invasive reference standard to detect early and late compilations, and consequently to address patients to the best management possible. Contras-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) should be considered the most important and useful imaging technique to evaluate the surgical site. Thanks to its speed, contrast, and spatial resolution, it can help reach the final diagnosis with high accuracy. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered as a second-line imaging approach, especially for the evaluation of biliary findings and late complications. In both cases, the radiologist should be aware of protocols and what to look at, to create a robust dialogue with the surgeon and outline a fitted treatment for each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.